Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
social influence - Coggle Diagram
social influence
milgrams study
-
situational variables; uniform- Bushman 72% 52% 48% , proximity- variation of Milgrams hot plate 30% in the same room 40% and location - variation of milligrams run down office compared to Yale uni - dropped to 48%
evaluation - ethical issues before hand participants were told they could withdraw but in the study they were promoted to keep going
evaluation - Orne and holland suggest that the participants knew it was fake but kept going due to demand charcterisircs
evaluation - Perry analysed the taped from milligrams studies and identified that they did think it was fake
minority influence
consistency, flexibility and commitment is key
snowball affect - slowly referring majorities views to the minorities views creates a snowball affect
key study - moscovi = each group comprised of 4 native participants and 2 confederates, they were shown a series f blue slides that altered in intensity at the end of the trial the participants were asked the colour with a consistent approach the confederates said green and managed to make 2/3 trials say green
A03 - research support for flexiiblity= beltymeyer examined flexibility when looking into Jurys amount they decided for compensation
hungry - the minority is powerless so they must negotiate their thoughts and views across to the majority in order to do this they must become flexible
-
-