Please enable JavaScript.

Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.

TTMS Evaluation Criteria (100 Marks) - Coggle Diagram

- - - - Note: 4 or more Completed projects of USD 1M+ = (2 marks)
      - Note: 3 Completed Projects of USD 1M+ = (1 marks)
      - Less than 3 Completed Projects = (0 Mark)
    - - Note 5 or more Completed Projects. = (8 Marks)
      - Note 4 Completed Projects. = (6 Marks)
      - Note 3 Completed Projects. = (4 Marks)
      - Les than 3 Completed Projects = (0 Mark)
  - - - 4 or more Completed Projects = (3 Marks)
      - 3 Completed Projects = (2 Marks)
      - 2 Completed Projects = (1 Mark)
    - - 4 or more Completed Projects with 100kW or greater = (2 Marks)
      - 3 Completed Projects 100kW or greater. (1 Mark)
    - - No of Completed Projects using Agile Methodology ((Team members >50).
        
        4 or more completed projects (6 Marks)
        
        3 Projects (2 Marks)
      - No of Completed Projects using SAFe Methodology (Team members >50).
        
        2 or more completed project (8 Marks)
        
        1 completed Project (4 Marks)
  - - - 3 or more completed projects (3 Marks)
      - 2 completed Projects (2 Marks)
      - 1 complleted Projects (1Marks)
    - - No of Completed Projects developed on Micro services Architecture
        
        3 or more projects (3 Marks)
        
        2 Projects (2 Marks)
        
        1 Project (1 Mark)
    - - No of Completed Projects developed on Container Orchestration Platform Experience
        
        2 or more projects (2 Marks)
        
        1 Project (1 Mark)
    - - No of Completed Projects developed on Service Mesh Experience
        
        2 or more projects (2 Marks)
        
        1 Project (1 Mark)
  - - - No of Completed Projects which involve application development in multiple languages
        
        2 or more Project (2 Marks)
        
        1 Project (1 Mark)
    - - No of ongoing or Completed Projects in Transport Sector
        
        3 or more projects (3 Marks)
        
        2 Projects (2 Marks)
        
        1 Project (1 Mark)
- - - - If Proposed Cloud Management Platform uses PADU
        
        Preferred Cloud Management Platform Product = (4 Marks)
        
        Acceptable Cloud Management Platform = (2 Marks)
        
        Use of Discouraged / Unacceptable Cloud Management Platform = (0 Mark)
      - Use of Product(s) not mentioned in the Technology PADU, then it shall be evaluated using the technology principles mentioned in the Annexure
        
        If more than 70 % are met = (2 Marks)
        
        If it is 50-69 % are met = (1 Mark)
        
        If less than 50 % = (0 Mark)
    - - If Proposed BI Portal Platform Product
        
        Preferred BI Portal =(2 Marks)
        
        Acceptable BI Portal = (1 Mark)
        
        Discouraged / Unacceptable BI Portal = (0 Mark)
      - Use of Product(s) not mentioned in the Technology PADU, then it shall be evaluated using the technology principles mentioned in the Annexure
        
        If more than 70 % are met = (2 Marks)
        
        If it is 50-69 % are met = (1 Mark)
        
        If less than 50 % = (0 Mark)
  - - - If Proposed Event Streaming Product mentioned in Technology Stack PADU
        
        Preferred Event Streaming Product mentioned = (2 Marks)
        
        Use of Acceptable Event Streaming Product = (1 Mark)
        
        Use of Discouraged / Unacceptable Event streaming platform product = (0 Mark)
      - Use of Product(s) not mentioned in the Technology PADU, then it shall be evaluated using the technology principles mentioned in the Annexure.
        
        If more than 70 % are met = (2 Marks)
        
        If it is 50-69 % are met = (1 Mark)
        
        If less than 50 % = (0 Mark)
  - - - If Proposed Container Orchestration Platform uses PADU
        
        Preferred Container Orchestration Product = (2 Marks)
        
        Acceptable Container Orchestration Product = (1 Mark)
        
        Use of Discouraged / Unacceptable Container Orchestration Product = (0 mark)
      - Use of Product(s) not mentioned in the Technology PADU, then it shall be evaluated using the technology principles mentioned in the Annexure.
        
        If more than 70 % are met = (2 Marks)
        
        If it is 50-69 % are met = (1 Mark)
        
        If less than 50 % = (0 Mark)
    - - If Proposed Portal Platform Product uses PADU
        
        Preferred Portal Platform Product = (2 Marks)
        
        Acceptable Portal Platform Product = (1 Mark)
        
        Use of Discouraged / Unacceptable Portal Platform Product = (0 Mark)
      - Use of Product(s) not mentioned in the Technology PADU, then it shall be evaluated using the technology principles mentioned in the Annexure
        
        If more than 70 % are met = (2 Marks)
        
        If it is 50-69 % are met = (1 Mark)
        
        If less than 50 % = (0 Mark)
  - - - Extent of Open-Source Software Qualitative assessment based on – 1) Max. use of Open-source software with managed support; 2) Minimum License and Support Cost; 3) Easy availability of Skilled resources
        
        Very Good = (2 Marks)
        
        Good = (1 Mark)
- - - - Qualitative Assessment by Evaluation Committee
        
        Very good = (3 Marks)
        
        Good = (2 Marks)
        
        Acceptable = (1 Mark)
        
        Not Acceptable = (0 Mark)
    - - Qualitative Assessment by Evaluation Committee (Key parameters of evaluation are: Closeness to recommended design in bid, BoQ complying with the technical specifications, Compliance to requirements) –
        
        Very Good = (7 Marks)
        
        Good = (5 Marks)
        
        Acceptable = (3 Marks)
        
        Not Acceptable = (0 Mark)
    - - Qualitative Assessment by Evaluation Committee –
        
        Very good = (3 Marks)
        
        Good = (2 Marks)
        
        Acceptable = (1 Mark)
        
        Not Acceptable = (0 Mark)
    - - Qualitative Assessment by Evaluation Committee –
        
        Very good = (3 Marks)
        
        Good = (2 Marks)
        
        Acceptable = (1 Mark)
        
        Not Acceptable = (0 Mark)
  - - - Qualitative Assessment by Evaluation Committee -
        
        Very good = (3 Marks)
        
        Good = (2 Marks)
        
        Acceptable = (1 Mark)
        
        Not Acceptable = (0 Mark)
    - - Qualitative Assessment by Evaluation Committee -
        
        Very good = (3 Marks)
        
        Good = (2 Marks)
        
        Acceptable = (1 Mark)
        
        Not Acceptable = (0 Mark)
    - - Qualitative Assessment by Evaluation Committee -
        
        Very good = (3 Marks)
        
        Good = (2 Marks)
        
        Acceptable = (1 Mark)
        
        Not Acceptable = (0 Mark)
    - - Qualitative Assessment by Evaluation Committee -
        
        Very good = (3 Marks)
        
        Good = (2 Marks)
        
        Acceptable =* (1 Mark)
        
        Not Acceptable = (0 Mark)
  - - - Qualitative Assessment by Evaluation Committee -
        
        Very good = (10 Marks)
        
        Good = (7 Marks)
        
        Acceptable =* (5 Marks)
        
        Not Acceptable = (0 Mark)
- - - - Qualitative assessment based on –
        
        Integrated set of tools that run automatically on check in of code to all environments including CI/CD pipeline plus all other required testing and other tools = (5 marks)
        
        Demo of the CI/CD pipeline tools to deploy a set of micro services = (3 marks)
        
        Not ready implemented = (0 marks)
- - - - Audited financial statement should demonstrate the current soundness of the Bidder’s financial position and indicate its prospective long-term profitability
  - - - (i) must have successfully executed at least two (2) software development contracts based on Agile methodology of combined value of at least USD fifteen (15) million.
      - (ii) Must Have successfully executed at least two ABIS implementation and/or integration contracts either with independent projects or as a part of a larger project.
      - (iii) The bidder must have Implemented at least 2(two) certified data centers (Tier-3 or Tier-4) or 3 (three) uncertified data centers. The implementation should be at least at two geographical locations with an active-active configuration.
        The experience can be either in independent contracts or this aspect can be part of larger contracts.
      - iv) The bidder must have experience of 2 contracts related to managed private cloud implementation. (NEW)