Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
W13 - Meg John Barker Chap 8 1 & 2 + 13.3 INDIVIDUAL APPROACH OF…
W13 - Meg John Barker
Chap 8 1 & 2 + 13.3
INDIVIDUAL APPROACH OF CONFLICT
ANGER
NOT ALL ANGER LEADS
TO AGGRESSION
EVOLUTIONARY
PSYCHOLOGISTS p.57
ANGER =
PROTECTIVE
EMOTION
FIGHT FOR SURVIVAL
SOME OTHER
PSYCHOLOGISTS p.57
ANGER USEFUL
TO SUCCESS OR
CHALLENGE INJUSTICE
WHEN ANGER BECOMES DESTRUCTIVE
RATHER THAN CONSTRUCTIVE p.58
DEBATE
CULTURAL VARIATION
ANGER PROBLEMATIC
IN CONFLICT
HARDER TO LISTEN,
SEE DIFF POINTS OF VIEW
THINK CLEARLY p.58
Baumann & DeSteno
PPL SEE WORLD MORE
THREATENING WHEN ANGRY
ANGER MANAGEMENT
EFFECTS OF ANGER
REMAIN FOR SOME TIME
TIME OUT ADVISED p.58
BUT EFFECT DEPENDS
WHAT PPL DO DURING
TIME OUT
RUMINATION
KEEP ANGER
BUT VERY DIFFICULT TO DO
CATHARSIS THEORY
(Freud) p.58
GOOD TO RELEASE ANGER
RATHER THAN SUPPRESSING IT
PUNCH PILLOW
BUT Brad
Bushman's study p.59
NOT HIT PUNCHBAG
= THE LESS AGGRESSIVE
HIT PUNCHBAG WITHOUT
RUMINATING = LESS AGGRESSIVE
THAN RUMINATING ONES
BUT James Pennebaker p.59
REFLECT° (writing
/ speaking) HELPFUL
COGNITIVE BIASES
& SELF-JUSTIFICAT°
SELF-JUSTIFICAT°
Tavris & Aronson p.60
SELF-JUSTIFICAT° =
ROOT OF CONFLICT IN RS
DIFFICULT TO DISENGAGE
FROM CONFLICT BCAUSE
STHG ABT THEIR
SELVES UNDER THREAT
DEFEND SELF-CONCEPT
Leon Festinger p.60
COGNITIVE DISSONANCE
PPL'S BELIEFS DISCONFIRMED
= THEY HOLD TIGHTER ONTO THEM
BECAUSE NEED
SAVE SELF-CONCEPT
COGNITIVE DISSONANCE
IN CONFLICT p.61
PPL WANT TO
BELIEVE THEY ARE GOOD
BUT OTHERS TELL THEM
THEY ARE NOT
SO DEFEND THEMSELVES
& CONVINCED OTHERS WRONG
= POLARISAT°
COGNITIVE BIASES
CONFIRMAT° BIAS
SELECT EVIDENCE TO CONFIRM
OTHERS' WRONGNESS
SELECTIVE MEMORY
Tversky & Marsh
study p.62
GENERALISING
STATEMENTS IN
CONFLICTS
ATTRIBUT° BIAS
(explain cause of things) p.62
PERSONAL FACTORS vs
STUATIONAL FACTORS
REVERSED DURING
CONFLICT
SOLUT° = LOOK FOR
EXTERNAL FACTORS