Please enable JavaScript.

Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.

antiPLT - Coggle Diagram

- - - - A+C vs C
        
        A+C incr bleeding and similar efficacy in ASCVD
    - - A+D vs A
        
        A+dip has less MACE, bleeding, more HA in minor/TIA
    - - Agg vs p
        
        decr stroke, similar death
    - - A+C vs A
        
        DAPT只在症狀性ASCVD有效
    - - A+D vs A
        
        less stroke or death
  - - - 2-3 vs A
        
        W has more bleeding, similar efficacy in minor TIA
    - - 3-4.5 vs A
        
        INR 3-4.5 much more bleeding in minor/TIA
  - - - A vs D vs pcb
        
        都有效減少stroke/death, agg 更有效
- - - - A+C+D vs A+C
        
        dip+A+C比DAPT易出血
    - - A+C vs A
        
        DAPT> SAPT
    - - A+C vs A
        
        DAPT> SAPT, 併90天出血較多
    - - A+T vs A
        
        DAPT> SAPT, tica出血較多
    - - A+T vs A+C
        
        CYP2C19 loss of func用tica有較低stroke, similar bleed
  - - - A160 vs p
        
        low IS, death
    - - A300 vs p
        
        lower IS, more ECH
- - - - Agg vs C
        
        Agg 相似stroke, 較多ICH in minor stroke
    - - Ci+A/C vs A/C
        
        less IS in KHADS-VAsm
    - - A+C vs A
        
        DAPT在lacunar增加MB, death
    - - Agg vs A
        
        日本在IS未達不劣性
  - - - C vs A
        
        lower MACE in ASCVD
    - - A vs pcb
        
        -18% stroke or death, more bleed
- - - - 1.4-2.8 vs A
        
        W較A有更多minor bleed