Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Smart utopia VS smart reality: Learning by experience from 10 smart city…
Smart utopia VS smart reality: Learning by experience from 10 smart city cases
Smart city of Tampere in Finland
Internet household penetration reached a 72%
and online public service usage a 50%
This city succeeded in 2 dimensions
Smart people - in terms of growing a knowledge community and utilizing local universities on common targets
Smart economy - in terms of growing digital economy and creating new jobs
A sustainable mobility was encouraged for the people.
Smart transport
It had a grow local digital economy
They worked to have more open spaces
Megacity of Seoul
A ubiquitous project in partnership between the local government (SMG) and the local ICT industry.
The Transport Operation and Information Service (TOPIS)
The “Owl Bus” is an innovative late-night bus service
All of the new smart services are being deployed under the plan "Seoul Master Plan 2030"
A “smart”but a “happy”city
They freed car lanes from big avenues for pedestrian or bus use because they have now space limits.
They worked on the concept of a eco-city, for the benefit of the population.
Smart City of Vienna
The initial project portfolio mainly focused on energy efficiency and innovation enhancement.
Today a strategic vision for 2050 lead several initiatives that vary from new district development and district renovation.
As a large-scale proiect, local skateholders are part of the process.
This smart city interlinks energy, mobility, buildings and infrastructure
Projects are funded by local, national and European resources and address a common vision
There's still a lack of growth in the local economy because it has not been prioritized.
It maintains open spaces
Sustainable transportation networks
Smart City of Hong Kong
It’s the development of a district from scratch (Cyberport) and of sustainable living efforts (green spaces and walkable districts) respectively.
Hong Kong is characterized by...
A high economic development rate.
A low political risk
Centralized governance favoring shorter decision-making processes.
A unique weather conditions that determine particular needs.
It offers public Wi-Fi
Smart infrastructure and lots of sensors were being deployed in the city to sense environmental conditions and traffic.
Open data
Green interventions
Real time traffic data
If they want to grow in a better way, tech alone can't support Seoul in the international city arena.
Despite local economic strength, poverty can be seen all around the city which may generate a technological divide due to inability to access technology and corresponding opportunities.
Geneva the small smart city
The smallest international city with 200,000 residents
This network started as a pilot project with strong local government's support, it interconnected theinternationalorganizationslocated in thecityand progressively several local companies.
Strategic Programme for Sustainable Development 2011-2014”
Service Agenda 21 Ville Durable
Efforts contain several innovative activities but, they do not name them smart or intelligent
Encourages sustainable mobility with several means
free public transportation
tickets given at hotels
free-of-charge airport train
intelligent transportation network
They went for a smart-infrastructure project (fiber-optic and smart-grid network)
Almendra Teycalco García García A01746426