Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Differences between Holistic Rubric and Analytical Rubric - Coggle Diagram
Differences between Holistic Rubric and Analytical Rubric
Holistic Rubric
Single criteria rubrics (one-dimensional) used to assess participants' overall achievement on an activity or item based on predefined achievement levels.
Performance descriptions are written in paragraphs and usually in full sentences.
Advantages:
Emphasis on what the learner is able to demonstrate, rather than what s/he cannot do.
Saves time by minimizing the number of decisions raters make.
Can be applied consistently by trained raters increasing reliability.
Disadvantages:
Does not provide specific feedback for improvement.
When student work is at varying levels spanning the criteria points, it can be difficult to select the single best description.
Criteria cannot be weighed.
Analytic Rubric
Two-dimensional rubrics with levels of achievement as columns and assessment criteria as rows.
It allows us to assess participants' achievements based on multiple criteria using a single rubric.
We can assign different weights (value) to different criteria and include an overall achievement by totaling the criteria.
Written in a table form.
Advantages:
Provide useful feedback on areas of strength and weakness.
Criterion can be weighted to reflect the relative importance of each dimension.
Disadvantages:
Takes more time to create and use than a holistic rubric.
Unless each point for each criterion is well-defined raters may not arrive at the same score.