Plato and Aristotle

Aristotle

body and soul

4 causes

The Good

The Prime Mover

formal (shape)

efficient (creator)

material

final (purpose)

monist - soul and body intertwined - once cannot live without the other

hierarchy of souls : vegetative, animal, human

"we are what we repeatedly do" - practise makes perfect - "excellence is not an act but a habit"

good habits allow us to reach eudimonia

Archer analogy

likens acting virtually to an archer - must take conditions into account when aiming for the middle

golden mean : right action is imbetween extremes of deficiency and excess

ref. virtue ethics and criticisms

series of cause and effect chain initially caused by necessary PM, exists independently from us - perfect being - only thinks of itself

final cause as not subject to change

we are drawn towards PM

what allows us to develop

things in potential form need efficient cause to reach actual form

rejected Plato world of forms - rejected idea that form is separate and something objects try to imitate, form of an object is intrinsic to it

BUT : does our universe really have a purpose

BUT : why are people drawn to evil id PM is perfect

BUT : does not explain creation, how are things drawn out of nothing

BUT : why should we have to make an effort to be good if naturally drawn towards PM

BUT : free will

human telos is eudimonia

soul is formal cause

ax analogy : body is metal and wood, soul is ability to chop

BUT : disanalagous - can not equate physical to metaphysical

cannot commit physical actions as would need to change

BUT : discredited by scientific developments in quantum physics , matter can change without efficient cause

Hume : we can not be truly certain anything causes anything else

correlation can not certainly denote causation

just because observed P caused Q in past can not confirm it will in all future scenarios

deduced from empiricism

BUT : empiricism criticisms, eg. Descartes argument from deception : possibility our senses deceive us --> should not use empiricism as fundamental ground of argument

not a creator God - reason for worlds existence - so separate from potentilaity-actuality arc

BUT : seems like A is just making a logical exception that allows God to exist

evolution : the way we develop is random, not driving for a particular purpose

PM is one case A moves from empiricist argument to rationalist in order to explain metaphysical - is this problematic?

Plato

Theory of the forms

Analogies

the sun

the divided line

the cave

body and soul

Form of the good

combination of soul and matter - soul lives eternally in realm of forms

forms are unchanging and perfect

everything in world is representation of a form - what we see (particulars - changing, material, imperfect) are shadows of forms

learning is a recollection of what our soulds know in realm of forms

idea of perfection - as all form are perfect they participate in forms which participate in form of good

hierarchy in world of the forms - form of the good is superior - transcends all over forms

dualist

soul preexists in realm of forms - given to us by demiurge

soul split into rational, spirited and appetitive

CHARIOTEER analogy

charioteer : rational

two horses : spirited then appetitive (as lower down)

evidence

recollection argument - soul must exist before birth otherwise we would not be able to learn anything - all have idea of perfect justice even if it does not exist in this world - must have come from realm of forms

affinity argument - assuming immaterial world exists, soul must live there when body dies

cyclical - every process has a reverse eg. all dead things were once living - cycle so soul must live on after body

everything is in a hierarchy - rationality is superior - visible realm (opinions) inferior to intelligible realm (knowledge)

people can only see shadows of real objects, as they are immobile can never fully grasp idea of "perfect object"

sun is the form of the good

like sun, form of the good is needed to see - illuminates rational part of the soul - "gives knowing to the knower"

everything contingent on FoG

STRENGTHS

idea of striving for best form is beneficial for sculpting society - ref. Plato 'Ideal state' - regardless of truth value

BUT : Plato's ideal state was very totalitarian, idea pf 'philosopher kings' seems elitist

BUT : if we are conscious beings - how do we access ideas in heavenly state - how do body and soul communicate

BUT : Plato - Parminidines : there could be an infinite amount of forms from dust to beauty, all equally specific to particular - no practical value

Aristotle questioned idea of infinite regress

Parmenideines : how can they interact with particulars if one is changing and one is unchanging in nature. - ideal of beauty constantly changing so how can this be linked to one form

Whitehead : "modern philosophy is a series of footnotes to Plato"

many types of chair - only one perfect chair - how can indivisible form be present in multiple particulars

set grounds for Religion - metaphysical philosophy has practical application as giving values/moral rule book

but Plato disagreed with Aristotelian idea that particulars can not be separated from form - purely shadows - separate entities - if no link seems illogical we can access them in realm of forms

convincing analogy as we can have no comprehension outside our senses

BUT : seems disanalagous as prisoners could understand what is outside of cave if they had the chance, we cannot comprehend anything beyond sensoty input

BUT : no a posteriori evidence - is a priori proof around recollection, opposities enough?

COUNTER : differing views nighlight worldly imperfection - all converge to form X in some way

BUT : Hume : reason is slave of the passions, is placing reason above all actual good, against human nature

not convincing as opposites do not always exist within things i.e. hard table was not once soft

how does brain obtain information to recall forms - why do we not recall everything immediately

Russel : "bottomless pit of nonsense" - where do we stop assigning forms

abstract ideas just help us understand physical world - Russel - does the ideal form of cat have any real meaning outside physical installations. of 'cat'