Please enable JavaScript.

Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.

Why can't Canice’s Kitchen effectively communicate social impact for…

- - - - Lack of awareness of competitor strategies
        
        Lack of time to research due to focus on delivering services
        
        Lack of connection to other 'competitors' due to focus being on partnering as much as the present tie
      - Lack of awareness of the importance of data
        
        Lack of necessity of different types of data up until this point
  - - - Lack of traditional methods of marketing
        
        Unable to tap into the main mass marketing channels e.g. tv ads, radios
        
        Lack of connections that are willing to use their channels to promote the cause
      - Lack of using current social media trends/platforms
        
        Unaware of how to use the platforms in the business context
        
        Lack of use or experimentation amongst staff/volunteers due to more mature age bracket
        
        Lack of training for staff, which may be essential
        
        Lack of design content/inspiration due to limited use of socials by clientele
        
        Unaware of which platforms to use due to the multitude of options available
        
        Lack of creativity amongst the limited staff/volunteers
        
        Lack of strategic plan for communications due to oversight of the necessity
    - - Overlapping Content (Repitive)
        
        Focused only on a limited number of key goals (getting donations, getting volunteers)
        
        Did not see importance / think of alternative sections and how it may benefit their cause
      - Lack of Clarity in UX
        
        Font to white space ratio not optimal
        
        Hard to navigate when seeking specific info
- - - - Lack of Prior Training
        
        Business acumen was not a requirement in hiring for charity work
        
        Pursuing training consumes too much capital and time
      - Lack of competent staff
        
        Lack of advertising for skilled volunteers
        
        Volunteers never asked/prompted if they possess the necessary skills to help the business in sorting financials
        
        Lack of understanding of assignable roles to human capital regarding managing data. (So staff were never assigned)
    - - Data collection is too time consuming
        
        Lack of human resources power/number
        
        Volunteers don't have enough bandwidth
        
        Too much data to physically record
      - Lack of capital to support infrastructure
        
        Hiring experts to design an effective system is too costly
        
        Designing an effective data collection system is too complex
  - - - Data collection does not directly contribute to the main organizational daily objectives
      - Data collection impedes daily tasks
    - - The value of presenting metrics was undermined
        
        Previous partners did not require sophisticated metrics
        
        Previously obtained help and outsourced this task through third-party assistance.
      - The need to perform the task occurred too rarely
        
        Partners don't demand occasional update on metrics
        
        There is lack of use of metrics on an occasional basis like being implemented in a monthly newsletter for instance
- - - - CK also don't know what they want from partnerships
      - Religious Stigma
  - - - Lack of effective acquisitions
        
        Lack of capital to acquire staff and volunteers
        
        Organisation lacks understanding of their needs for acquiring volunteers
      - Lack of staff and volunteer retention
        
        Insufficient extrinsic awards (certificates or cash)
        
        Insufficient information to determine if tasks align with intrinsic motivation
    - - No HR manager
      - Lack of HR planning