Ableism is defined as overarching acts of prejudice and/or discrimination against people with disabilities (PWD) and the devaluation of disability (Hehir, 2002). These actions and attitudes place higher value on particular types of physical, mental, and/or emotional capital and ways of being—specifically, they follow socially constructed expectations of ability, valuing these expectations over different types of ability and disability (Loja, Costa, Hughes, & Menezes, 2013). Mackelprang and Salsgiver (2015) describe ableism as targeting physical, emotional, and mental differences, as compared to the social norm, and considering people with these differences to be a burden, objects of pity, and/or problems to our society, as well as incapable of independence. The authors showcase in their writing that ableism is manifested in society through institutionalization, education segregations, and policies/laws that restrict disabled individuals from working (Mackelprang & Salsgiver, 2015).
“Microaggressions are the brief and commonplace daily verbal, behavioral and environmental indignities, whether intentional or unintentional, that communicate hostile, derogatory or negative racial, gender, sexual and religious slights and insults to the target person or group” (Sue, 2010, p. 6).
“Microaggressions are the brief and commonplace daily verbal, behavioral and environmental indignities, whether intentional or unintentional, that communicate hostile, derogatory or negative racial, gender, sexual and religious slights and insults to the target person or group” (Sue, 2010, p. 6). eight themes regarded the different types of microaggressions that are perpetuated against disabled people. These eight themes were: exclusion from the mainstream population, responses of astonishment from nondisabled others related to myths about disability, receiving the message from nondisabled others that disability or PWDs are inherently abnormal and undesirable, receiving the message from nondisabled others that disability and PWDs are burdensome, PWDs’ experience of nondisabled others who assume to “understand” or identify with the experiences of PWDs, responses of pity and apologies from nondisabled others, experiences with nondisabled others’ odd or awkward avoidance behavior, and experiences with intrusive behavior of nondisabled others who assume PWDs need assistance or lack ability.
many participants spoke to how people had randomly stopped them to pray over them. This experience was then generalized into the item: “A stranger offered to pray for me based on my disability status.”
Much time and energy is spent on empowering clients and students in different contexts, but it is also important that human service providers and educators acknowledge the pervasiveness of ableism. Simply telling disabled individuals to push through or move past these interactions is unhelpful—in fact, providers and educators may be among those unintentionally microaggressing their own clients. Rather, it is important to think more systemically about how the ongoing experiences of ableism affect disabled clients, as well as ways to better support people with disabilities on being resilient in an ableist society.