Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
"60 Minutes" And the Benghazi Scandal Trap
November 12, 2013
…
"60 Minutes" And the Benghazi Scandal Trap
November 12, 2013
New York
3) Conducting an interview without properly vetting the source and obtaining the information relative to the story.
-
-
-
-
3) In a years time, there must have been other sources the reporter could have interviewed to provide more of the Administration's perspective than the 3 they had did not seem to have much information.
4) Why did the report defend Davies' after the lies? Did she not want to take the full fault of her mishap?
-
1) Where was the F.B.I. report and why was the story released before adding this to the news report?
-
2) The F.B.I. report was given out after the '60 minutes' story to blast Davies and prove his real involvement in the situation.
1) Having different stories proves that no one knows truly what happened and facts could have been withheld.
2) The reporter should do more research and fact check as much as possible in the future to avoid the backlash this story had.
3) This is a sad story of four Ambassadors being killed, and Davies should be ashamed of the mockery he has now brought on this story.
1) He lied to get his fame because he was there, and now should lose all credibility.
-
-
-
-
-
-
4) Documenting the events that took place and what Davies was doing during that time would improve the validity of his story.
5) Finding more of the Administration's perspectives could tell a more refined story since that seemed to be the goal anyway.
-
-
-
My opinion on the issue, and what caused me to form that opinion
Using a balance in research and reporting tactics to make a difference in the outcome that was reported