Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Rethinking international trade theories descarga (8) - Coggle Diagram
Rethinking international trade theories
New theories
-
-
Evolutionism
innovation and technological change are key factors in explaining growth and economic transformation, in which innovation, competition and institutional change
Competencies are specific knowledge and skills developed by companies that determine the type of activities they can carry out efficiently.
-
Structuralism
Center-periphery
According to the classics, the mechanisms of the market and technical progress should favor the
developing or peripheral countries
but the distribution of the benefits of international trade was not equitable, but favored developed countries (center) more than developing ones (periphery).
In the periphery, increases in agricultural productivity generate an overabundance of labor while the center keeps for itself the fruit of its technical progress and absorbs the benefits of increased productivity from the periphery.
-
Dependency theory
Relations between the center and the periphery eliminate any possibility of development in underdeveloped countries (Pakdaman, 1996).
there is a contrast between the mode of growth, technical progress and international trade between peripheral and central economies, an argument related to the thesis of the deterioration of the terms of trade (Ferrando, 2012).
ECLAC ideas sought to demonstrate that the gains from international trade could be distributed unequally and that state intervention is necessary in order to balance these structural asymmetries.
-
commercial policy implemented by a particular government through intervention and regulation aimed at modifying the strategic interaction that occurs in certain sectors between national and foreign companies in the international arena
Relies on market imperfections to regulate windfall profits from oligopolistic markets and technological externalities
Possibility that government action could create a comparative advantage. where you can alter the "rules of the game" benefiting national companies
-
New new
trade theories
the differences of the companies empirically are fundamental to understand the commerce
international, taking into account the heterogeneity
stylized facts
the most productive become exporters compared to non-exporters (Clerides 1998)
exporting companies have more employees, are more productive, pay higher wages, add greater value added
per worker and are more capital and capacity intensive.
-
-
Latest theories
global value chains
consists of the production of a good in several countries, thanks to advances in transportation and communication
outsourcing allows countries that have available labor to specialize in that factor
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=llZb1E5UrOg
the Know-how model cannot be understood with traditional theories since it cannot calculate the added value, where the services sector has a greater participation
downstream are located where it is more profitable to carry out the last stages of productionhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1TTImw_WLWY
The situation is presented in which countries and companies benefit from imports, which depends on the place of origin of imports.
Services
services represent more than 70% of world GDP, where in some there is growing relative importance
the trend is a change in preferences
of consumption to the detriment of goods and in favor of services, which causes deindustrialization
According to the models, services cannot be consumed in different places, so according to the comparative advantage analysis, it does not apply.
trade
of transport and communication services generates the most important effect on merchandise trade and can be detected
certain indications of complementaritybetween trade in goods and
trade in services
-
-