Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Impact of SGA Advisors on Leadership Development - Coggle Diagram
Impact of SGA Advisors on Leadership Development
Defining the Role of SGA Advisor
Highest Standards rated in importance: Communication, Leadership, Advising, Professionalism,
Student Learning and Development
, and DEI.
Gutierrez (2012)
Categories of Role Conceptualized (by peers/students/campus): Developing Student Leaders, Advisor Characteristics, Institutional knowledge, Professional Development and Training, Campus Activism
Barnett (2019)
Structure and procedures, freedom to try new things, bring historical knowledge, discern when to intervene, help to achieve goals
Miles (2011)
Many roles assumed by a general advisor (mentor, teacher, educator, motivator, risk agent
Ferris, et al (2011)
Training and Preparation for SGA Advisors
Gap in standards rated as important vs what most confident in, and SA Pros not required to engage in continuing ed.
Gutierrez (2012)
Minimal attention/commitment to training and support despite high expectations
Barnett (2019)
All SA Pros should be trained in leadership programs (students in SG should receive leadership training)
LaBoeuf (2020)
Advisors should receive ongoing training on how to support socially responsible leadership development
Stevens (2021)
Faculty Advisors: learned by trial and error. Campus Activities Pros should rethink structures for faculty advisors
Lyons (2015)
Themes effective in training methods: interaction among advisers, experiences of seasoned advisers, dialogue and other learning techniques, etc.
Shapiro (2012)
SG Impact on Students
Enhanced leadership skills/career benefits, relationship building and networking, enhanced social/civic engagement
LeBoeuf (2020)
Relationships between female role models and Female SG Presidents particularly important
Damell (2013)
Development of how students make decisions while in SG, learned the importance of reflection
Long Gallegos (2017)
SLOs for SG Students grouped into governance, ethical and civic behavior, experiential learning
Nevin (2017)
Frameworks informing SG Advising
Transformative Advising Model
Barnett (2019)
Call for Leadership Training/Development for SG Leaders
Particularly for women in SG, critical to provide opportunities to develop (workshops, emerging leaders programs, etc.)
Damell (2013)
Students in leadership roles in SG should receive leadership training
LeBoeuf (2020)
Guided reflection as accountability measure and outlet for critical thinking
Long Gallegos (2017)
Impact of Advisors on Students and Student Orgs
Importance of relationships and knowledge/skills from advisor to students, advisors play role in org growth
Grossman Leopard (2017)
Frameworks informing Leadership Development of SG Students
Leadership Identity Development Model (relationships with women critical in LID)
Damell (2013)
Socially Responsible Leadership: Students involved in SG develop this
Stevens (2011)
Situational Leadership
Grossman Leopard (2017)