Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Chapter 13 - Neutrino Oscillation - Coggle Diagram
Chapter 13 - Neutrino Oscillation
Solar neutrino
Produced in pp, pep, hep, \(^7Be\), \(^8B\) processes.
E < 20 MeV
.
Pure
\(\nu_e\)
\(\nu_\mu\) are produced in accelerators: proton fire at target -> produce \(\pi\) -> decay to \(\mu + \nu_\mu\) -> \(\mu\) are absorbed
\(\nu_\mu\) dominate instead of \(\nu_e\) because of chiral structure ("wrong helicity" of the lepton)
\(\nu_\tau\) are also produced in accelerators at much higher energy through charm decay: \(D_s \rightarrow \tau \nu_\tau\)
Neutrino interaction types
Elastic
: \(\nu_e - e\) interaction; nucleus intact. Exchange W/Z. Electron is knocked out of atom, moving in the
neutrino direction
.
CC threshold: \(s = (p_\nu + p_e)^2 > m_l^2\)
\(E_{\nu_e} > 0\) (just kinematic; also depending on
nuclear binding energy
)
\(E_{\nu_\mu} > 11 GeV\) (hard)
\(E_{\nu_\tau} > 3 TeV\) (crazy)
Process: \(\nu_l + e^- \rightarrow l^- + \nu_e\)
Due to large threshold, usually
only
\(\nu_e\) participates in elastic CC.
Inelastic
: \(\nu - N\) interaction, exchanging W/Z. CC produce a charged lepton, NC produce neutrino +
free neutron
. NC does
not have kinematic threshold
.
CC threshold: \(s = (p_\nu + p_n)^2 > (m_l + m_p)^2\)
\(E_{\nu_e} > 0\) (just kinematic; also depending on
nuclear binding energy
)
\(E_{\nu_\mu} > 110 MeV\)
\(E_{\nu_\tau} > 3.5 GeV\)
Process: \(\nu_l + n \rightarrow p + l^-\)
Super-Kamiokande
To solve the
solar neutrino problem
: deficit of \(\nu_e\) in Homestake mine experiment (Ray Davis,
inverse beta decay
: \(\nu_e + Cl(n) \rightarrow Ar(p) + e^-\)
Primary channel: \(\nu_e\)
elastic scattering
(oxygen has large binding energy for inverse beta decay) \(\nu_e e^- \rightarrow \nu_e e^-\), (
CC + NC
).
50 kT water-cherenkov detector, surrounded by PMTs.
SNO
Aims to measure both \(\nu_e\) and the total solar neutrino flux.
10T deuteron (2.2 MeV binding energy;
enough for inelastic scattering
) shielded by pure water.
Interactions:
Inelastic
CC: \(\nu_e\)
NC: all
Elastic scattering (what Super-K measures)
CC: \(\nu_e\)
NC: all
Conclusion: neutrino oscillates -> neutrino has mass -> weak (flavor) and mass eigenstates are different!
Neutrino oscillation
PMNS Matrix
Unitary, 3 mixing angles, 1 phase
. After decomposing to rotation matrix, have \(\theta_{12}, \theta_{23}, \theta_{13}\), and \(\delta_{CP}\)
To express a W
vertex
from flavor to mass states: \(-\frac{ig_w}{\sqrt{2}}(\bar{e}, \bar{\mu}, \bar{\tau})_i \gamma^\mu \frac{1}{2}(1-\gamma^5)U_{ij} (\nu_1, \nu_2, \nu_3)_j \)
If
neutrino
enters as
adjoint spinor
, use \(U_{ij}^*\)
Therefore, if a neutrino is produced, then e.g. \(\nu_e = \sum\limits_i U_{ei}^* \nu_i\)
2-generation oscillation
\(P(\nu_e\rightarrow\nu_\mu) = \sin^2(2\theta)\sin^2\Big(\frac{\Delta m^2_{12}L}{4E_\nu}\Big)\) , = \(\sin^2(2\theta)\sin^2\Big(1.27\frac{\Delta m_{12}^2[eV^2]L[km]}{E_\nu[GeV]}\Big)\) where \(\Delta m_{12} = m_{\nu_1}^2 - m_{\nu_2}^2\)
1.27 comes from \(\hbar c = 0.197 [GeV] [fm]\)
One param \(\theta\); Suppose start with \(\nu_e\), write in terms of \(\nu_1, \nu_2\), apply time evolution, and convert back.
3-generation oscillation
\(P(\nu_e\rightarrow \nu_e) \rightarrow 1 - 4|U_{e1}|^2|U_{e2}|^2\sin^2\Delta _{21} \) - \(4|U_{e1}|^2|U_{e3}|^2\sin^2\Delta_{31} \) - \(4|U_{e2}|^2|U_{e3}|^2\sin^2\Delta_{32}\)
\(\Delta_{ji} = \frac{\Delta m^2_{ji}L}{4E_\nu} = \frac{(m_j^2-m_i^2)L}{4E_\nu}\)
Only
two
of all 3 \(\Delta_{ji}\) are
independent
, e.g. \(\Delta_{31} = \Delta_{32} + \Delta_{21}\)
Note:
MSW effect
changes the oscillation when neutrino propagate in a medium with
changing density
. Net effect: enhanced \(\nu_e\) flux.
Mass hierarchy
Measuring oscillation only gives the Abs(mass-squared difference), not the absolute value of mass or the hierarchy.
Measured: \(\Delta m_{21} = m_2^2 - m_1^2 = 8 \times 10^{-5} eV^2\), \(|\Delta m_{32}| = |m_3^2 - m_2^2| = 2 \times 10^{-3} eV^2 \)
Normal hierarchy: \(m_1 < m_2 < m_3\);
Inverted hierarchy: \(m_3 < m_1 < m_2\)
Reactor-based experiments
Principle
Produce \(\bar{\nu}_e\) through \(\beta\) decay with known flux
\(E_\nu \approx \) 3 MeV
Could only detect
disappearance
(kinematic threshold too high)!
Method
\(e^++e^-\rightarrow \gamma \gamma\) (
prompt
photons)
neutron is
captured
later (e.g. by Gd), emitting another \(\gamma\) (
delayed
photon)
\(e^-\) are scattered by \(\gamma\) through
Compton scattering
,
ionizing
the liquid scintillator and produce
scintillation light
.
Detect through inverse beta decay: \(\bar{\nu}_e + p \rightarrow n + e^+\)
Sensitive to different params depending on the
baseline
\(P(\bar{\nu_e} \rightarrow \bar{\nu_e}) = 1 - \cos^4(\theta_{13})\sin^2(2\theta_{12})\sin^2\Big(\frac{\Delta m^2_{21} L}{4E_\nu}\Big)\) - \(\sin^2(2\theta_{13})\sin^2\Big(\frac{\Delta m^2_{32} L}{4E_\nu}\Big)\)
Baseline: O(1km) sensitive to \(\theta_{13}, \Delta m^2_{32}\); O(100km) sensitive to \(\theta_{12}, \Delta m^2_{21}\)
Daya Bay
Goal: measure \(\theta_{13}\) with six reactors + near/far detectors; distance ~
O(1km)
. \(\Delta m^2_{32}\) measured by other experiments.
Calculate event ratio in
far/near
detector (expect deficit due to oscillation). Then fit for \(\theta\).
Competed with
RENO
(Korea) and
Double Chooz
(France)
Result: \(\sin^2(2\theta_{13}) \sim 0.1\)
KamLAND
Same location as Super-K; detect \(\bar{\nu_e}\) from multiple reactors; flux-weighted distance ~
O(180km).
1-kT liquid scintillator.
Could not resolve oscillation due to \(\Delta m^2_{32}\).
Result: \(\Delta m^2_{21} = 7.6 \times 10^{-5} eV^2\), \(\sin^2(2\theta_{12}) = 0.87\)
Measures oscillation as a function of \(L/E_\nu\)
NOTE: \(\Delta m^2_{21} >0\) is given by solar neutrino data; could also say it's by definition.
Accelerator-based experiments
MINOS
Fermi lab -> \(\nu_\mu\) beam (peak at
3 GeV
) -> Soudan mine;
735 km
apart. ND:
1 km
from the source, measuring neutrino flux and energy profile.
\(P(\nu_\mu \rightarrow \nu_\mu) \approx 1 - A \sin^2\Big(\frac{\Delta^2_{32} L}{4 E_\nu} \Big)\); sensitive to \(\theta_{23}\) and \(|\Delta m^2_{32}|\) ("
atmospheric
" neutrino oscillation)
With fixed baseline, measure oscillation as a function of \(E_\nu\)
Result: \(\sin^2(2\theta_{23}) > 0.9\), \(|\Delta m_{32}|^2 = 2.3 \times 10^{-3} eV^2\)
Channel: CC interaction; \(E_\nu = E_\mu + E_x\)
T2K
Study \(\nu_\mu \rightarrow \nu_e\) appearance
Measure \(\theta_{23}\)
CNGS (
OPERA
detector)
Search \(\nu_\mu \rightarrow \nu_\tau\)
NOvA
(successor of MINOS)
Study \(\nu_\mu \rightarrow \nu_e\) appearance
DUNE
Study \(\delta_{CP}, \theta_{13}, \Delta m^2_{13}\)
\(U_{ij} = \begin{pmatrix} 0.85 & 0.5 & 0.17\\ 0.35 & 0.6 & 0.7\\ 0.35 & 0.6 & 0.7\end{pmatrix}\)
\(\delta_{CP}\) is not known yet
\(\theta_{12} =35^\circ, \theta_{23}=45^\circ, \theta_{13}=10^\circ\)
\(\Delta m^2_{21} = 7.6 \times 10 ^{-5} eV^2\), \(\Delta |m^2_{32}| = 2.3 \times 10^{-3} eV^2\)