Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Free Movement of Workers - Coggle Diagram
Free Movement of Workers
-
origin
initial idea if couldn't find work, could move to member states tthat was undersupplied
-
-
article 45 TFEU
-
-
-
who is bound
horizontal effect
angonese v cassa horizontal direct effect, binds private parties as well - aim is no discrimination in full labour market
-
cross border element
-
Metock 3rd country national applied for asylum, married Irish national - ECJ - workers needs to have exercised freedom of movement
Morson and Thanjan v Netherlands children dutch nationals, but never worked outside Netherlands so no entitled to status of EU workers (for parents non-EU citizens)
direct effect
Commission v France certain percentage must be french, violated EU law
-
-
whose protected
workers
-
Levin getting minimium wage but below subsistence level - if genuine economic activity doesn't matter if can't life of it
-
-
-
job seekers
Antoninessen right to move freely and stay for reasonable period of time seeking employment - 6 months sufficient time to find work
equal access to employment, although need to be worker to benefit from social and tax advantages
-
family members
-
regulation 1612/68
spouse, descendants (if under 21 or dependent
spouse
Netherlands v Reeds spouse limited to marriage not co-habitation (although here dutch law entitled person in long term relationship as right to residence so was extended
-
-
indirect discrimination
-
Sotigu seperation allowance, not paid to anyone resident abroad - more likely to be nationals
Allue and Coonan the duration of the contract more likely for teachers for foreign languages whcih was normally foreign teachers
ugliola- lenght of service in german army influence pay- more likely to be germans in army - indirect discrimination
language requirements
Groner somone from Netherlands looking for position, requirement of competence in Irish,- allowed as part of ongoing policy in protecting language
angonese required certificate, difficult for people from other member sates to get as bilingual requirement - indirect discrimination
-
Regulation 129/2011
-
-
Social Benefits
Ministere Public v Even depends if linkted to status as worker and if facilitates mobility within the community
Christini widow not french but seeking benefit of French widows, entitled to it as entitled to all social advantages national workers entitled to
Ionnidis tideover allowance if fishined work in Belgium, entitled to get it if finished school elewhere
Leclere entitled to invalidity benefit as related to work but not entitled to child allowance as not connected to work
-
-
-
self employed
-
-
cross border
Knoors Netherlands self-employed, worked in Belgium, can't be excluded from benefity from community law on basis lawfully in another MS and acquired trade qualification
-
-
-
-
Derogations
article 52 TFEU
exception on grounds of public policy, public security or public health
-
-
-
-
Regulation 1612/68
prohbits on grounds of nationality - regards to remuneration, dismissal, re-instatement and re-employment
-
-
-