Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Blondes 'to die out in 200 years' - BBC News, 2002 - Coggle Diagram
-
-
-
How could balance in research and reporting tactics have made a difference in the outcome of what was reported
The simple fact that there are dissenting opinions should be mentioned in the headline, if not lead the headline.
The more well-sourced opinion should be the lead of the article and the opinion that blonde's may become extinct should be featured very last, if at all.
The research that blondes are at danger of becoming extinct needs much better sourcing. "Research" in general isn't a reliable source. We should know what organization or person conducted the research and have access to the raw data to support the sensationalized headline.
How could using a balance in research and reporting tactics have made a difference in the outcome of what was reported
-
The better sourced research, which in this case is the dissenting, should be just as prominent, if not leading.
The imagery supporting the article should be even, if not leaning toward the better sourced research.
-