The Great Leap Forward (1958-1961)

click to edit

New Economic Policy

AIMS

click to edit

click to edit

IMPLEMENTATION

click to edit

Conditions

OUTCOMES

TRANSITION TO SOCIALISM/RAPID ECONOMIC GROWTH

Increase of radical, social and ideological to prevent the “danger” of slipping into capitalism

avoid the risk of privilege economic inteligencia

Unemployment and underdeveloplment

lack of foreign investment

In the Moasit point of view the process of modern economic development; AIMS

1st : seizure of state power

2nd : transformation of social relationships

3rd : development of productive forces

"In making revolution, one must strike while the iron is hot, one revolution following another; the revolution must advance without interruption. " - Mao (page 195)

The transition to socialism was according to Mao “basically completed” in 1956

Economically backward

The "poor and blank" thesis: April 1958

People are not educates so they are not technically educated in the wrong way

click to edit

Transition from socialism to communism

"Special revolutionary virtues" that Mao attributed to the Chinese people in April of 1958

You can teach people how to make iron,... Because they do not know anything -> they start from scratch

"In history it is always people with a low level of culture who triumph over people with a high level of culture." (207 on pdf - pg 199)

"[It] because of China's backwardness that its people possessed
special revolutionary capacities and were uniquely amenable to the appropriate spiritual transformation" (page 207 on pdf - pg 199)

Comunes

3 years of struggle 1000 years of Communist happiness

Mao slogans: “Faster, better, cheaper” & “if you have a strong desire to develop heavy industry, then you will pay attention to the development of agriculture”

continue heavy capital investments to develop industrial sector and increase in light industry agriculture by using the labour of the masses => simultaneous economic development

click to edit

Technological Revolution

click to edit

Why was the comune system implemented

What where the Comunes composed of

What where comunes

2000 pesant households

It gave greater autonomy to the local provinces and allowed them to work independently to greater there own production

Comunes were places that organised the peasants as well as set goals for them to reach and give a sense of community

Mao's economic plan resulted in a ‘lopsided development’
Ex: Peasantry had no expertise of making raw materials so they weren't vial for manufacturing

Mao’s program: science and technology advances were to be made without professionals or technocrats to not expand the intelligentsia --> teaching the peasants to master technology (‘socialist-conscious, cultured laborers’)

resulted in peasants not knowing how to adequately use technology since no professionals are helping them => inefficient and unsuccessful

AIMS

24,000 peoples comunes

750,000 collective farms

Ranged from less than 5,00 people to 100,000 people in one commune

click to edit

OUTCOMES

POLITICAL MOTIVES & RESULTS

Lushan Plenum (1959)

Main issues that confronted the Plenum:

click to edit

click to edit

Future of communes and the Great Leap / Mao's political future / control of People's Liberation Army

Resulted in a confrontation between Mao and Peng Dehuai (Peng Dehuai was a veteran revolutionary playing a major role in the Red Army since joining Mao in 1928, who also commanded Chinese forces in the Korean war)

foreign policy :

in Peng Dehuai's view (a common one amongst military leaders) China's domestic policies were intimately related to its military policies and USSR relations

China's military security depended on economic development for the weapons provided by the USSR

the GLF threatened development and the Sino Soviet alliance

the more threatening aspect was also Maoist plans to revive popular militia

Peng returned to China that June and launched an attack on the GLF making a Letter of Opinion (key event) addressed to Mao condemning communisation, collapse of national planning, party alienation, etc

all of which he attributed to the "petty bourgeois fanaticism" of Maoists

Peng was unlikely to be involved in a Soviet scheme in anti-Mao efforts, but it was promoted that he was

Mao's view

click to edit

in 1959 he claimed "bourgeois elements infiltrated [the] communist party”

in 1960 Mao no longer commanded fully the party or their policies

the remainder of his Lushan victory was control of his armies through Lin Biao

He took the same steps as Marxism but went quicker and missed some. He was accused of going to quickly and judged by Marxists

Economic Commentary

the GLF revival of 1959-1960 proved that Mao's victory at Lushan was 'hollow'
facing worse conditions in the revival, people were starting to lose faith in rural communities

click to edit

China was heavily dependant on the USSR economically since they would copy their development models => an extent of political dependence on the Soviet Union

National pride and new economic goals led to the biggest principle of the Great Leap: ‘self-reliance’

Mao 1958: ‘to import Soviet codes and conventions inflexibly is to lack the creative spirit’

click to edit

the difficulties associated with the communes were now attributed to 'right opportunists' who underestimated achievements and overestimated defects

communal mess halls and private peasant plots were to be restored and destroyed respectively

click to edit

Mao forced the party to choose between him and Peng Dehuai => he tied party leadership to his identity (cult of the individual parallel?)

since party leaders did not want the drama of trying to remove Mao, they went along with his policies

the 8th CC Plenum also convened where Peng was isolated and his criticisms were discredited as well

Mao insisted Peng should be politically disgraced and was obliged

most communists were just as committed to national independence as Mao himself

Peng was dismissed as minister of defence and his supporters were removed from key army positions

he was succeeded by Lin Biao

click to edit

Iron and Steel campaign was a policy that made peasants make steel in there back yard to increase production. It ended up failing as it turns out people who don't know how to make steel make bad steel.

the Plenum was used to propagandised The Great Leap & reaffirmed benefits for people's communes

Foreign policy

“The Great Leap Forward campaign, which began with such great expectations in 1958, thus ended in 1960 with an economic and human disaster for China and a political debacle for Mao Zedong. It created a legacy of bitterness and distrust between the peasantry and the Communist Party. The Great Leap further contributed to the collapse of the Sino-Soviet alliance, an increasingly precarious external situation to a grave internal economic crisis.”

General consequences of the GLF