Contracts

Common Law or UCC? ALWAYS STEP 1!

Goods predominate

Real estate and services predominate

UCC

Is someone a merchant?

Common Law

Formation? Step 2

Some parts of Art 2 may/n't apply

Offer with definite and certain terms is communicated with intent to enter a K

Bilateral K: exchange of promises

Unilateral K: Promise exchanged for performance

Acceptance

Consideration (rare, mostly MBE)

No Defenses, such as:

Before revocation, rejection, or counteroffer = valid acceptance

Counteroffer negates 1st offer, switches parties around

mere bargaining is not a counter

mirror image rule applies: if a new K isn't
the same as the OG, it's a counteroffer

Mirror image rule doesn't apply: counter
with new terms counts for acceptance

conditional acceptance is a counter

Mirror image rule: accepting but changing the
terms may/n't be, depends on UCC or CL

counter under CL

acceptance under UCC

if critical terms are different, knockout rule
cancels both conflicting provisions

Offeror can control the method of acceptance

If offeror says nothing, ee can accept by starting performance

Acceptance by letter

valid on dispatch

if sending an acceptance after a rejection, then
whichever gets there first is valid

but in a unilateral contract, offeree
must finish for contract to be valid

a bargained for exchange

Reciprocally induced legally valuable detriments/promises

an act of forbearance works if it gives a benefit to the other party

CL: pre-existing duty can't act as
consideration for a new promise

UCC: New consideration is not reqd to modify a
goods contract, good faith is the only test

Promissory Estoppel: substitute for consideration, requires:

  1. Reasonable, detrimental, and foreseeable reliance
  1. Enforcement is necessary to avoid injustice

1.Promise

lack of capacity

Statute of Frauds (VERY COMMON FOR QUESTIONS),
requires a signed writing including the material terms of the K

illegality

misrepresentation

nondisclosure

duress

unconscionability

mistake of fact (either mutual or unilateral)

people under 18

mental incompetents

intoxicated people

Suretyship (promise to pay another's debts)

Promise in consideration of marriage

K that can't be done within a year

real estate contracts

sale of goods for $500 or more

if mutual then voidable by the adversely affected party

unilateral enforcement is not voidable unless the non-mistaken person had reason to know about the mistake, then voidable by the mistaken party only

Interpretation: Step 3

K construed as a whole, preference given to written provisions using the OG meanings of words, construed against the drafter if ambiguous

Gap filling provisions

For if K isn't explicit

Parol evidence rule

Warranties

Express warranty

Implied warranty of merchantability

implied warranty of fitness for a specific purpose

created by the seller

become part of the agreement if they are the basis of the bargain

included with every sale of goods

goods must be fit for their ordinary purposes

requires a direct representation by the seller or seller's representative that the product will fit what the buyer wants

unusual fact patterns, usually a seller
picking something out for a buyer

can alter this with explicitly excluding or
modifying their language about merchantability

must be conspicuous if in writing,
ie words like "as is," "with all faults," etc.

Can also alter/exclude this warranty by course of
dealing, course of performance, or usage of trade

missing terms - supplied by ucc

whether the meaning of a document can be determined by the negotiations of parties prior to the written contract. 2 Questions

  1. What's the purpose of the evidence being intro'd
  1. Does the evidence relate to a term/K that's integrated

integrated is whether parties inteded written K to be the final terms

was a merger clause included? generally says something like "this writing is the complete and entire agreement of the parties" if so, then can't use this

also may look at how detailed K is

if purpose is to explain/interpret terms of a written K, it's admissible (may need to show ambiguity)

UCC uses usage of trade, course of dealing,
and course of performance to supp terms

Performance: 4

Remedies: 5

3rd Paries

Duty to perform generally discharged by:

performance

tender of performance

a completed condition subsequent

Otherwise discharged if it's:

illegal

impossible

impractical

frustrated

rescinded

other party fails to fulfill a promise large enough to breach K

Conditions

type

implied

constructive

express

timing

concurrent

precedent

subsequent

Breach

minor

must still perform, but get dmgs

major

excused from performance and entitled to all remedies available

UCC: buyer may reject some or all of product if it doesn't conform. Can't reject after accepting/failing to inspect, unless goods are so defective their value is substantially impaired

at CL, watch out for preexisting duty rule in modification questions

Monetary Damages

expectation damages

reliance damages

restitution

liquidated damages

Under UCC

seller's remedies depend on whether goods have been delivered

buyer's remedies include damages or specific performance. A key factor is if buyer has bought replacement goods

Equitable remedies

Specific performance

restitution

unjust enrichment

negative injunctive relief

only if money would be inadequate relief, ie land/unique objects

watch out for Laches defense

beneficiary

assignment

delegation of the obligation

do they have standing to sue promisor?

incidental beneficiary? no

Intended beneficiary

against breaching promisor? yes

against promisee not performing? no,
must be an independent obligation

transfer right to receive benefits to someone else.
May transfer all or part of a right

Assignee may enforce K against obligor

can't assign rights that substantially change a K's risks/duties, those that are for future rights to arise under future K's, and those that are illegal

3rd agrees to perform part of K for one of the parties

delegator is still on the hook unless there's a novation

novation:obligee releases delegator from
obligations in exchange for liability of delagatee

can't delegate

personal performance K when relying on individual's unique qualitys

if K prohibits