Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Digital Ethics, Humans vs Technology, The debate: privacy vs security,…
-
Humans vs Technology
Technology has a potential that is nearly limitless, it may solve each one of our contemporary day's problems (like the climate change)
Our question then is not "if" or "how" can we realize a new technology, but "why" should we do that
It progresses at a much higher speed than humanity intelligence does, it is more adapt than us in the most of our jobs, so everything that can be automated will be in the near future
So what is going to happen to our "human" part (as our emotions), that can't be taught to machines?
Scientists don't know whether robots can be truly intelligent, like humans. AI's target is to reproduce our thinking processes (think, learn, reason) to solve the tasks they are programmed for, even better than how humans would do it (for exaple, chess computers)
How do they do it?
They first collect a big amount of data from human stimulations, then they learn, doing the actions they consider the most successful and, if it actually make them accomplish the objective, they store it, repeating it once more if the problem shows up again.
Can machines become our partners? The first family robot, called Jibo, was created with the intention of answering this question, with the developers stating that every family will possess one and that they will be able to erase boredom and solitude
A balance is needed between humans and technology: we should't become technology (we should only use it), we can't let AI control us*, and we shouldn't create new creatures** by modifing us or other animals
Nick Bilton: "Machines don't have morality, and likely never will"
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
