Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
PIL, Global movement of transforming customary law into treaty law - legal…
PIL
Vienna Convention
Making Process
-
-
Negotiations
The negotiation is essentially political and it is deeply related to sovereignty, reason why it should not be limited by international law
Signature ad referendum
The representative signs but states that the competent authorities of their country need to confirm the act. It is therefore only binding after the confirmation of those competent authorities
-
Entry into force
Can the ratification be tacit? - we need to check on the internal constitution what the internal procedure for ratification can be tacit - highly unlikely, the professor does not know of any. However, the right answer for that question is depending on the national law
-
-
-
Invalidity, termination and suspension
-
-
Treaties vs. Agreements
Treaties have a more complex procedure of consent. Agreements are simpler, they can be concluded by ambassadors, depending on the countries constitutional requirements
-
Portugal - the PR has to sign all the international agreements; USA - the ambassadors' signature is enough, as the USA Constitution allows for ultra simplification of agreements
2.º 1. a) A Treaty is defined by a set of characteristics, not by the name of the document
Phases
-
-
Entry into force and provisional, application of treaties
-
-
-
-
-
-
Monism vs Dualism
-
Legal Pluralism
-
The main concern is the norm itself, not its source
-
-
Monism
-
-
-
International law depends on the willingness of the state, since it need a new law inside the country
If we live in a completely separated international law system, its only theoretical since laws have to be applied locally to have an actual effect
-
Examples - European directives - they need to be transposed to national law (although there are theories about direct application); USA - International laws need an act of transposition
-
-
-
-
Global movement of transforming customary law into treaty law - legal certainty - Guatemala v Honduras - fishing in the river - practice + legal obligation
As long as later, after ratification, you are able to comply with the treaty, you are complying with article 18
The state is not already bound after signing. It is bound after ratifying it
Article 18 - does it impose an obligation on states to pursue internal procedures for ratification?
The end of the procedure could be the denial of ratification. The question is if the states are obliged to start the procedure - Professor Matias things that good faith imposes that
What happens if a state refuses ratification? - article 18 ceases to apply
Signature ad referendum (authentication) - the representative declares that the text in the one that he negotiated. However, it needs to go through an internal process because the person negotiating most of the times does not have the power to bind the state
-
Ratification - The Treaty comes to the President. It is the Government who initiates the procedure. The Government alone does not have powers to bind the state - the parliament needs to approve and the president needs to ratify the treaty