Nature and Urbanization
City
Rural
Pros
Cons
Pros
Cons
Conserve and Protect the Environment within the City
New industries, factories, universities are built
Long highways are built for swift urban transport
Vertical buildings are constructed to accommodate more people in less spaces
Big landscape acquired for rapid growth
Large population also means excessive pollution related to urban life such as higher carbon emission by factories, transportation, etc
Massive deforestation and shrinking agricultural land expected for establishing industries and accommodating large immigrant population if not planned properly by the government
Large migration of people create a civic chaos
Large farms provides food security to millions in rural and urban places.
Mountains, rivers and streams also works at tandem with nature for livelihood of the rural lifestyle
Large forests work as an agent to hold rain water for agricultural life
It lacks modern infrastructure like schools, universities, hospitals for the current generation to lead a dignified life
Prone to climate change, life and livestock's are always at risk
Lack of modern resources in rural life leads to multi dimensional poverty
New communities are created for further action
Both Humans and Animals can co-exist based on conservation practices
Within cities, nature habitats should be constructed
Rapid urbanization generates a large amount of employment opportunities
Loss of Biodiversity
Marine life and wild animals also are better protected due to co-existential life
Rain forest blocks are made to minimize low yield agricultural practices
Flower valleys should be created within the cities to enhance the human life
Poor and primitive agricultural practices has an empirical impact to the rural livelihood, as low income group are unable to afford growing demands of the family
Higher energy consumption for electricity, cooking, heating, etc
Higher consumption of food and durable goods