At the Met Gala, Gemma Chan paid tribute to the first Chinese American movie star, Anna May Wong. Her black sequin dress was adorned with a dragon emblem, and her hair resembled a braided style that was often a part of Wong's iconic look. I have found myself struggling with the question of representation in the past year. Gemma Chan has become a champion at the forefront of Asian representation advocacy, and I am a personal fan of her acting. But as inspiring as it is to see Asian representation in the media, how far does representation go in dismantling this nation's deeply rooted seeds of white supremacy? How far does representation go when those who are "represented" are still seen in the context of whiteness? At the same time, progress becomes impossible without represented voices. In Chan's Instagram post, she says that Wong paved the way for those who came after her. Interestingly, Wong appeared on television decades before there were multiple Asian faces on screen. Wong was also exploited, filling the role of the "exotic" dragon lady or sexual temptress when Hollywood needed her. Chan's tribute to Wong asks the question: is representation, albeit exploited, necessary for a road to liberation? Is there such thing as a "net good" of policies such as the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, which created both benefits and harms? Or, like Wong, will our "representation" only continue to be a cog in the American capitalist machine?
-