Georgina Kleege, Blindness and Visual Culture: An Eyewitness Account - In talking about 9/11 many assumed that true horror can only be evinced through the eyes. Many eye witness accounts however are stickingly non visual. “Many people who were in the vicinity of ground zero during and soon after the disaster found it hard to put into words what they saw, in part because visibility in the area was obscured by smoke and ash and in part because whatthey were seeing did not correspond to any visual experience for which they had language. People described instead the sound of falling bodies, hitting the ground, the smekll of the burning jet fuel, and the particular texture of the ankle deep dust that filled the streates”. (183)
Being sighted does not mean that you are better. When you are blind your other senses become sighted/ There are many inaccurate assumptions about the blind because our language is based on vision. “I hope we can also abandon the cliches that use the word blindness as a synonym for inattention, ignorance or Prejudice. If the goal is for others to see what we mean, it helps to say what we mean. Using the word in this way seems a vestigial homage to the hypothetical, meant to stir the same uncanny version of all and pedi. It contributes on some level to the perception of blindness as a tragedy to dire to contemplate, which contributes in turn to lowered expectations among those who educate and employ the blind. It also contributes to the perception among the newly blind themselves that the only response to their new condition is to retire from View.” (188)