Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
“60 Minutes” and the Benghazi Scandal Trap
December 5, 2021 - Coggle…
“60 Minutes” and the Benghazi Scandal Trap
December 5, 2021
How could using a balance in research and reporting tactics have made a difference in the outcome of what was reported
Having a main resource such as video evidence or witness to support the claim, would have had much better support.
If he wanted to make his story sound more believable, he should of taken a detailed account of everything that took place and what he did and make it to where its believable. However, taking a few days to get a descriptive account of the compound I think would not have hurt either.
-
What is your opinion about the issue, and what caused you to form that opinion
Had no proof of his whereabouts and sightings. I think because of that, any statement that was expressed was no more but a blank page.
My reason for what I believed happen, his guilt being the biggest one. I feel like he portrayed his actions the night of the attack were very unorganzed at best. He had a hard time keeping his sentences straight, mumbled often as to what he was trying to think of what to say.
He was and still is definitely at fault, I believe he lied to get his 30 minutes in the spotlight.
-
Play devils advocate, what opposing view could be expressed
How do we know that the Government and the F.B.I was covering up the event, and make a statement that the reports that was received was false.
FBI could have received the information, that was already been falsified to make the person of interest much worse than it already was.