2. She used Jones’s real name, Dylan Davies.

4. CBS lost fans by "accepting" Davies’s explanation of the incident.

3. Only two other people are interviewed on camera.

1. The program didn't correct its report, in the sense they didn't put out an accurate version.

1. The program should have corrected or taken down its report if it was false and misleading.

2. Reporters should never use names like that in that context if protected by law or right.

3. If you're going to try and prove a person wrong, you're gonna need more than two people to interview. Both of them have no clue what's going on.

4. CBS fan base deserves better than misleading articles about important politics. Instead, they should focus on better reporting.

1. I was frustrated that CBS released misleading information surrounding politics to the American people.

2. Also, frustration as reporters should keep a false name in reporting topics like these.

3. Shocked that they thought the two people to use for interviews were two individuals who had no knowledge of Davies

4. Justified reaction to misleading the American people

1. Frustration, my opinion is news agencies shouldn't be allowed to mislead people about American politics

2. Reporters who violated privacy laws that involved American politics should be hold accountable.

3. The amount of lack of understanding from both parties was embarrassing to try and have an accountable interview.

Having a "balance" in research and reporting tactics offers a steady flow of information that isn't backed by lies and mistruths. Proper reporting implies proper research. Proper research implies proper reporting.