Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
EK313 week 10/ unit 9 - Coggle Diagram
EK313 week 10/ unit 9
-
Punch - in Bolivia'
recorded' (scribbled down immediately afterwards) conversations rather than 'interviews' / 'directed conversation'.
want't sure what initial interview was about...was 'how became independent/ autonomy'. 'what is your usual day?'. Big themes; home/ school, work/ play. Like/ dislike etc. subsequent would focus on what was unearthed.
-
-
-
relationship between R & P. Let them take the lead. Over time little girl took to her and would run to great her. But at school still kept her distance.
-
-
-
careful not putting words in people's mouth. natural conversation often does so do pilot interviews to check not leading questions
Pickett- 50,000 survey (12 countries, now 35 countries)
best minds, take current literature, create questions
-
-
-
informed consent- and no harm is done to the CYP. If harm is it justified /balanced (ethics committee)
-
-
survey enables us to understand more about how many young people are involved in risky behaviour but not necessarily why they do so.
-
Pickett refers to some of the cultural and language issues encountered when writing the questionnaire
the researcher would not have been present when respondents answered to provide them with additional information or support.
Aldgate- semi structured
must not lead. eg. 'what do you think about parents visiting..' rather than ' do you think parents should visit you in Foster care?'
-
-
-
transparency essential for building trust. open, show questions/ areas of study. What purpose of research is. Benefit other children or parents. Improve services.
impressed how many are aware (and happy) that their research will help others (not necessarily them)
there is always going to be some bias- but be careful- do not feel sorry for them. Do not be influenced by own feelings of concern
groundwork to build up trust. Puppets, drawing etc. Give praise (positive reinforcement)
-
-
-
stick to time- people get tired. going on and on tempting to let it flow. But must keep focused on the subject.
-
it should be noted that the concept of generalisability in qualitative research is a very contentious one. mm
-
prolonged contact with participants is required to build up their trust, this approach is very time-consuming.
Newspaper article - nutrition piece
Job interviews
Surveys. including likert scale.
Interviewing practitioners in previous modules.
I have run auditions...did ask availability etc.
Visited open days (train to teach, schools for my children)
Call centre- surveys/questionnaires.
Establishing what happened when children fall out.
How was your day?
I think there is a perceived power imbalance with interviews. Perspective of interviewee is of being nervous; the employer is of higher status. However, as always say in auditions, we want you to be brilliant/ the perfect person. The person with control over how it goes is actually the interviewee. Similarly, in research, the interviewer obviously wants good data but a subject could be evasive.
-
I think life in general is basically an informal interview; meeting new people, social interaction, social etiquette to ask about them. Polite, gregarious people do anyway.
-
An interview provides an opportunity for a researcher to find out from the participants themselves what meanings and understandings they attach to their experiences and surroundings (Jones, 1985:46, cited in Punch, 2005:168). cited in MM
-
-
*ranging from a highly structured and formal interview with a predetermined list of questions and response categories, to unstructured and informal interviews in which the interviewer allows the participant to guide the nature and the course of the interview.*
Group discussions
a group interview might help the participants to alleviate their fears/concerns about talking to an adult researcher who is a relative stranger. The power dynamics would have been affected to some extent by the presence of the adult researcher in the room, but less so than if the adult had ‘chaired’ the discussion. Because of this the data collected had a stronger child perspective, as there were no ‘leading questions’ or ‘steering’ of the discussion in the direction that the researcher might have wanted. One of the disadvantages of this kind of approach is that the discussion could easily have gone off-task (in the main, this didn’t happen here) and although the researcher would end up with some interesting conversations, the content might not match the aims of the investigation or the research question.
-
-