Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
US-PK| CFR Shahmehmood - Coggle Diagram
US-PK| CFR Shahmehmood
Q/A Afghan
Q. PK hosting sanctuary in PK?
PK has made efforts to wipe em.
- Border management (Fenced and biometrics)
- We cleansed them out via military operations
Q. Does PK worry if TTP establish itself in Afghan?
Depends on how we deal TODAY
If we don't support Afghan, we're inviting disaster.
Q: PK takes credit for fall of Aghan?
No. It was the corrupt features, misgovernance, and tiredness of people that lead to their fall (Case in point- How fluently Taliban took over w/o resistance)
Q. Taliban 1.0 different than Taliban 2.0?
20yrs, 300k Forces, 2.3Tr dollars, melted away
Roles have changed (From coercion to diplomatic efforts, from war to end of war by Taliban... let's be innovative)Observe how they behaved:
- Supported evacuation
- Supported ppl inside
- Respected embassies.
US-PK
-
US-China deteriorating relations- PK as odd man out AUKUS, QUAD, and others. Where's PK's role? And dealing China?1.China has supportive, consistent, over the year relationship, trust of people, neighbor,
- Can US play role of mediator of peace with India? No.
- US not even recognizing the positive steps we're taking on like FATF. How do we respond?
Lots of commonalities: Democracy, 2/3 of US pop, role of private sector, market economy, stability in south Asia
History: When we worked together, good. When we worked against, it's been mistake
-
Borders
India
PM's 2pt approach: Fight poverty instead each other
But, blind alley in OJK
-
Afghan
-
PK: Joined extended Troika- (PK, China, US, Russia).
Govt in PK: Blamed PK for internal instability instead of fixing internal issues (Case in point- Fall of army for corrupt leadership)
Who lost Afghan?
- International coalition achieved its mission: Al-Qaeda is in shadow.
- PK & Afghan shared same objective. PK correctly diagnosed problems in approach
An unsustainable Afghan is bad for all, especially PK (TTP and BLP)
-