Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Matthew Hopkins and the East Anglian Witch Craze, 1645-47 - Coggle Diagram
Matthew Hopkins and the East Anglian Witch Craze, 1645-47
HOW FAR WERE ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL ISSUES RESPONSIBLE FOR THE EAST ANGLIAN WITCH CRAZE?
BREAKDOWN OF TRADITIONAL AUTHORITY AND LEGAL STRUCTURES
Political Context
1625: Charles I became King
Parliament gradually became a more important instutution, able to make laws without monarch approval
Late 1620s: Charles and Parliament disputed over finance and military expeditions
1629: 11 year period of Personal Rule
1640: Parliament recalled to fund fight with Scots, but during personal rule resentment of Charles grew
Many MPs were Puritan, and Charles' religious policy was Catholic in appearance
Legal Structures in East Anglia
Assize courts unable to function normally during the war, justice had to be served by those with limited legal experience
Developments regarding the strength of the New Model Army occurred, and assize circuits were disrupted because it was considered too dangerous for the judges to make the journey from London
The absence of senior judges meant that the witch-hunt was able to spread quickly - Mayors were thankful for Hopkins and Stearne because they provided what appeared to be legitimate legal knowledge, who were able to interrogate suspects - 42% conviction rate
Impact of the Breakdown of Traditional Authority
By 1645, East Anglia had been through 3 years of civil war.
At a time with high mortality rates, deaths from the war added strain - witches claimed that they had been left alone and vulnerable when husbands went to fight in the war
Shift in traditional power relationships - radical Puritan sects that were associated with witches believed that men and women were equal, chaos of war allowed for suspicions against these sects to be brought to the surface
Authority of the Church of England undermined, in areas controlled by Parliament, undesirable ministers were ejected and replaced by Puritans
Those with Royalist sympathies faced arrest and confiscation of their estates
Allowed for fears to grow that manifest into a witch-hunt, fear of enemy in the war developed to fear of 'enemies within'
ECONOMIC CRISES
Crop Failure
Wet summers + freezing winters = crop failures
Staple food items such as wheat and rye were inedible
Price of meat and cheese rose dramatically, price of wheat rose by 20%
Contemporaries viewed this as the most extreme wet weather in living memory
Puritan preachers viewed this as a punishment from God, Charles should not be returned to the throne
Easy to blame witches for people's misfortunes
Changing Land Use
The livelihoods of tenants and peasants threatened by inflation and inequality that came with common land
Increased begging from the poor, charity that was once provided by wealthy inhabitants was rare
Landlords tempted by evicting tenants and enclosing land to focus on a particular agricultural product
Wealthy residents expected to pay poor rates
Those who needed to receive donations viewed with suspicion, when poor and older, the wealthy began to fear that they would take their revenge for not receiving enough
Impact of the Civil War
Price of livestock increased by 12%, price of grain by 15%, because of the huge resources required by both sides of the war
Horses regularly confiscated, soldiers consumed food in large quantities when they marched through the countryside
If prices rose, wages did not rise with them
1643: Parliament devised a new tax to meet the increasing cost of war, that was 12x higher than Ship Tax
HOW FAR WERE MATTHEW HOPKINS AND JOHN STEARNE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE EXTENT OF THE WITCH CRAZE?
GEOGRAPHY, NUMBERS, CLASS AND GENDER OF VICTIMS
Gender
Class
Geography
Numbers
THE ROLES AND METHODS OF HOPKINS AND STEARNE
The Roles of Hopkins and Stearne
Methods Used by the Witchfinders
THE REASONS FOR HOPKINS' AND STEARNE'S INFLUENCE AND POWER
Hopkins
Stearne
WHY DID THE WITCH CRAZE COME TO AN END IN 1914?
THE GROWING COST
THE RE-ESTABLISHMENT OF TRADITIONAL AUTHORITY
THE ROLE OF JOHN GAULE