Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Shareholders and Shares - Coggle Diagram
Shareholders and Shares
-
-
rights of shareholders
-
general rights
right to a dividend
s 124 - company in general meeting may declare dividend can't exceed amount recommended by directors
no obligation to declare one while company solvent - but once declared becomes payable and if not paid can sue for money
-
Wilson v Dunnes Stores while shareholder is a creditor when owed dividend, not normal creditor, rank behind normal creditors - no longer entitled to dividend when insolvency - becomes part of assets - anything left after creditors paid - surplus assets
Flitcrofts directors liable for difference between unalwful divdidends and those that should have lawfully made
-
-
bairstow if accounts not prepared according to statutory requiremnets. distibution not lawful- best practice to prece distribution with auditors statement
-
it's a wrap couple owned business took dividend rather then salary - liable as taking dividned when company insolvent- knew it was a dividend and knew insolvent
burland earle company no obligation to divide all profits can keep reserves - court didn't want to ge involved
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
statutory rights
receiver copy of articles and memorandum (s37) to inspect and obtain copies of minutes and resolutions (199), to receiver auditors reports and balance sheets (338), petition court for winding up (571, oppression
preferential shares
-
dividend
receive fixed dividend every year and in priority to oridnary shareholders - presumed to be cumlative (Webb v Earle
-
imperial hotel (cork) - right to annual accumulative dividned - held survives winding up of company - payment by liquidator in preference to arres by ordianry shareholders
-
-
-
-
-
section 31
dictates company's constiution comprises statutory contract to bind company and members as if they signed it
-
Bratton Seymour Company v Oxborough difference between conventional contract and s31 - bidning force comes from statutue and effects members qua members
-
Hickman v Kenty Romney Marsh Sheepbreeders shareholder brought proceedings against company, article provided if such dispute arose first go to arbitration - company used provision to stay legal proceedings - court - created contractual rights and oblgiations - member had to comply with arbitration clause
Lee and Company v Egan s31 invoked to enforce rights between shareholders - to be offered shares first - has to be qua members
Eley v Positive Government solicitor also member, sought to enforce clause which restricted right to terminate employment, not applicable as cluase only relied on qua member
-
-
-
shareholders agreements
-
-
not registered, may be suitable for more sensitive matters
-
-
-