Data analysis - Data
Qualitative data
Quantitative data
Qualitative research gather information that is not in numerical form
E.g., diary accounts, open ended questionnaires, unstructured interviews + unstructured observations
Qualitative data is typically descriptive data and as such is harder to analyse than quantitative data
Attitudes, beliefs and behaviours
Evaluation of qualitative data
- More detail than quantitative data
- Greater external validity - more meaningful insight
- Difficult to analyse - patterns can be hard to find
- Conclusions can be open to researcher bias
- Quantitative research gathers data in numerical form which can be put into categories, or in rank order, or measured in units of measurement
- This type of data can be used to construct graphs + tables of raw data
- Often a narrow view of behaviour
- Looking at averages + differences between different groups
Evaluation of quantitative data
- Simple to analyse
- Comparisons between groups is easier
- May not represent 'real life'
- Numerical data is less open to bias
Primary data
- Field research
- Original data collected
- Arrives from the participants themselves
- Questionnaire, interview, observation
Strengths: Can design the questionnaire to suit what you want to find out
Weaknesses: Time, effort, money
Secondary data
- Data collected by someone other than the person conducting the research
- Often already been subject to statistical testing and significance is known
- E.g. Data in journal articles or website or population records held by the government
Meta-analysis (a form of secondary data)
Strength: Cheap, little effort
Weakness of meta-analysis: researcher may leave out studies with negative or non-significant results. It also depends on the quality of the studies/data being used
Meta-analysis: data from a large number of studies involving the same methods of research. Perform a statistical analysis of the combined data.