Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Step 3 IM - Program Design :D! - Coggle Diagram
Step 3 IM - Program Design :D!
Tasks
--> three :D!
Task 1
--> basic outline of program
generating ideas
--> brainstorming + core processes
e.g 'what would we do if we could do anything?'
theme
--> what is the main focus of the program (goal)?
-----> often tied into the program name like a brand image
components
-->
who
will get what intervention (determined by change matrix)
-->
how
will they get the intervention (personal, ads, online etc)
sequence
---> order in which intervention will be delivered
Task 2
--> choosing evidence based interventions / behavioral change methods
How change methods will influence quality of life (intervention logic model)
change methods
--> change objectives --> determinants --> performance objective --> individual/environment behavior --> health --> quality of life :D!
Taxonomy
two types
coding taxonomy
development taxonomy / Intervention mapping taxonomy
---> focus on IM taxonomy
coding taxonomy
---> behavioral change techniques (BCT)
--> categorizes + describes the different BCT's so that people can talk about the same terms and mean the same thing
----> DOES NOT SPECIFY IF THAT THEY ARE EFFECTIVE!!!
--> old way of doing it and reason why meta analyses etc. only found small effect sizes didn't take into account the 3 points needed from a change method to affect behavior (see top part abstract essence :D!!)
Development taxonomy / Intervention mapping taxonomy
---> behavior change methods (BCM)
---> systematic description in list form of all the change methods that have been shown to be effective in influencing determinants
lists:
what determinants they effectively influence
what theories and methods/interventions- they are based on
under what circumstances /
parameters
they are effective
How to use:
Step 1:
look at change matrix (step 2) to find the determinants
look at the taxonomy table to find the determinants there
Step 2:
look at the methods/ intervention / theory listed for each of your determinants and see which one suits your change objectives the most!
AND LOOK FOR THE PARAMETERS (things that have to be met in order for the intervention method to be effective) and how they suit your change objectives
Step 3:
look at the literature references provided for each change method/ intervention you choose to get an understanding of the theory behind it
then using the terms from the papers find more recent literature on the same topics to tailor your intervention just right! (keep parameters in mind !!)
Step 4:
repeat with all determinants :D!
IM taxonomy
methods may overlap
--> e.g: 2 methods can be rolled into one intervention based on your decision
--> OR one intervention like 'arguments' entails another intervention 'persuasive communication' from the get go but
shows that together they effective for that determinants
Behavioral
will add those later :D! literally just a list lol
Environmental
For a behavior change method (intervention) to be effective three things are needed:
must target determinant that predicts behavior (step 2 of intervention mapping)
must be able to change the determinant
must be practically applied to fit the determinants / population WHILE PRESERVING THE PARAMETERS (conditions under which the intervention is effective) :D!!
--> people fail to meet these steps is why interventions fail :D!
Core processes
--> same old 6 steps I have screenshot tailored to this though imma send u remind me :D!
Task 3
--> how to apply the change methods from task 2 to the population / nodes in the logic model while also satisfying the
parameters
for each of the methods so that they can be effective!
--> finishes with an evaluation:
are all change methods based on
theory
?
are the change methods
tailored to the population
:D?
are all the
parameters
for every method being used satisfied (conditions under which the intervention can be effective)?
2 papers about coding taxonomies
--> ogden 2016:
opinion paper so can be largely ignored
says populations are variable and taxonomies cant do shit cause they dont take that into account which is why smal efect sizes found --> doesnt apply to IM taxonomies
--> Michie 2012
also about coding taxonomies
highlights why they not ideal for planning interventions cause they list all interventions even those that are ineffective (Again this coding taxonomies so no determinates used which is why all dis is happening)
guideline for how to make taxonomies more effective is the same already done by Im taxonomies
Intervention logic model
--> change methods --> change objectives --> determinants --> performance objectives --> individual / environmental outcomes --> health outcomes --> quality of life :D!