Please enable JavaScript.

Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.

BUDDHISM, satkaryavad, panchaskand, Avidya, Vedana, Upadan, how prarityta…

- - - - every effect has a cause
    - - P.S.is corner stone of buddhist philos.
      - entire later deve. is basically depen on pratitiya sam
      - one pratitya samutpad is accepted logically will lead to
        
        anityavad
        
        ksanikavada
        
        theory of momentariness is a logical outcome of pratitya-samutpada
        
        anatmavad(Nairatmyavada)-no soul theory
        
        denial of eternal soul
        
        arguments in favor of changeable notion of soul
        
        4 more items...
        
        arguments supporting anantmavad can be used to support ksanikvada
        
        introduction
        
        anatmanvad is the logical culmination buddhist central theory that is called pratit samutpad
        
        patit samutpad
        
        1 more item...
        
        meaning
        
        1 more item...
        
        real meaning
        
        4 more items...
        
        if questions speaks of nairatmyavada then write spiritual and material with special emphasis on spiritual matter
        
        1 more item...
        
        Milind pano
        
        question of milind
        
        1 more item...
        
        arguments in favor of antamavada
        
        6 arguments printed notes
        
        every thing is momentary is nature
        
        object of this universe not only impermanent but momentary in nature
        
        eternity can be accepted as real. It is a mere illusion
        
        Context
        
        momentary objects are changeable in nature
        
        spiritual substance that is soul is also impermanent in nature
        
        comparision
        
        we can't take bath in twice in same river
        
        only change or becoming is real
        
        Middle path
        
        K.S supports middle path
        
        it is path b/w two extremes
        
        how?
        
        3 more items...
        
        Clarification
        
        Arguments in favor of ksanikvad
        
        Flame of a lamp
        
        Current of a stream
        
        like flame & current of river everything is changeable in nature but due to inability of our mind we were unable to perceive those changes but when we think logically or minutely every moment change is going in everything
        
        arthakarkariyakaritva
        
        an important argumentt support kshanikvada
        
        causal efficiency
        
        if anything has power to produce something it must be real
        
        only that thing is real which is momentary in nature
        
        Yat Sat Tat Kshanikam
        
        example
        
        Seeds
        
        2 more items...
      - meaning
        
        pratitya
        
        dependent on or related to cause
        
        samutpad
        
        origin of effect
        
        dependent on some cause
      - as soon as cause is destroyed effect is also destroyed
        
        flame and oil
        
        origin of flame is dependent on oil and cotton
        
        as soon as oil and cotton is destroyed flame is also destroyed
        
        use diagram
    - - cause of suffering
      - cessation of suffering
      - law of karma
      - relation between past present and future
    - - 2nd noble truth
        
        cause of suffering
      - 3rd noble truth
        
        cessation of suffering
    - - p.s supports middle path
        
        it is path between two extremes
        
        extreme affirmation
        
        extreme negation
      - how?
        
        M.p
        
        Extreme affirmation
        
        satkaryavad
        
        cause
        
        effect
        
        1 more item...
        
        extreme negation
        
        asatkaryavad
        
        cause
        
        effect
        
        2 more items...
        
        P.S
        
        cause
        
        effect
        
        conditional
        relativistic
    - - one pratitya samutapada is accepeted logically it will lead to
        
        anityavad
        
        kshanikvad
        
        niryatmavad
      - nothing is permanent in this universe every object is impermanent in this universe
      - every object is every moment changable
      - it is a universal theory
  - - - initial life
        
        highly materialstic
        
        later on got nirvana
        
        42 yrs of teaching
        
        regarding metaphysical questions
        
        silence
        
        1 more item...
  - - - knowledge
        
        knowable(object)
    - - according to vaibhashika knower find knowledge of object and this object is independent to knower
        
        through perception
        
        supported realism
        
        vahya pratyakshvad
    - - according to sautrantika- knower finds knowledge of objects and this object is separate and independent from knower
        
        through inference
        
        vahya anumeya vada
        
        vahya
        
        external object
        
        anumeya
        
        inference
        
        vada
        
        theory
        
        epistemological supports realism
      - in perception we find only the image of the object
        
        in perceived image we inference the existence of that object
    - - accepted
        
        knower
        
        knowledge
        
        object(external reality is denied)
      - knower finds knowledge of ideas
      - rejected external reality
      - object in the world are nothing but ideas
        
        ideas are real
        
        dependent on knower
      - examples
      - it is an important school of mahayana sect of buddhsim
      - practice of yoga
      - arguments against material world or refutation of material world
        
        there is no means of knowing any coordination b/w ideas & so called objects. since we know only the ideas to postulate an unknown objects as a counter part of our ideas is not logical
        
        example
        
        dream
        
        take help of printed notes
        
        sahoplambha niyam
        
        according to it there is an invariable relation b/w cognition and content . a thing is never proven apart from knowledge.
        
        example
        
        blue color and cognition of blue color appear together invariably
- - - - NIrvana
    - - Ashtanga Marga
- - - - singya
      - nidan
      - samskar
      - veda
      - it is a dynamic combination of physical and mental aspecs
        
        we can compare it with personality
- - - - practical point of view
        
        from practical point of view P.S accepted as relative causal theory according to it nothing exist independently in this universe origin of effect depends on the cause. In this sense everything is relative in this nature . in this sense everything is svabhav shunya has practical point of view P.S support relativity the relativity indicates shavabhav shunayata
      - transcendental point of view
        
        from Transcendental point of view reality is accepted as prapanch sunyata(beyond description. in this case P.S support indescribability. in this sense sunyavad finally support silence .
- - - - initial consciousness of the embryo