Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
critically evaluate the claim that deep and meaningful learning always…
critically evaluate the claim that deep and meaningful learning always leads to the best long term memory encoding
introduction
we're under the assumption that deep and meaningful learning means elaboration and understanding of the material which leads to the knowledge being used in a flexible maner [ie can be manipulated to be applied to problem solving and other jazz hands]
are we under the assumption that deep and meaningful learning doesnt need other factors to facilitate its performance
implicit learning can be deep and meaningful - just because its unconscious doesnt mean the brain isnt applying it to already known knowledge and making it make sense
under the assumption that deep and meaningful learning can happen at the inital stage of developing a memory item - possible evidence to suggest that it can happen throughout the development of that memory item until prroper understanding is maintained, ie rehearsal, practice, testing and restudy
under the assumption that long term memory encoding means everything that is stored about the target information, can be broken down into the features of the memory item, the cues for that item and the mediators between cues and the target
the statement assumes that this is always the best way for learning, suggesting a solely cognitive capacity for memory when bio structures are in play - when those are damaged long term memory encoding is impaired
perhaps theres more than 1 way for the rbain to perfform deep and meaningful learning - top down vs bottom up elaboration
-
-
-
-
-