Canadian government’s Perspective in 1914:
The Canadian government in 1914’s would have perceived Francis Pegahmagbow’s exclusion from the military to be wise and correct. Their perception would have likely been this because they perceived First Nations people to be potentially disloyal to their colonial leaders, and the Candian people. Thus due to their uncertainty towards someone like Francis in terms of a lack of trust that he would not revolt, betray, or take revenge upon the Canadian soldiers in battle or the new colonially acquired Canadian government, they perceived his exclusion to be wise and correct, as it would have been beneficial for them in their perspective.

First Nations perspective in 1914:
The First Nation’s in 1914 would have perceived Francis Pegahmagbow’s exclusion from the Canadian military to not be morally and realistically incorrect. This would have been their perspective because they perceive Francis Pegahmagbow as a genuine Canadian and First Nation. Thus as a First Nation, they would perceive that he has the right to fight for his country because they have been doing so since civilization began, regardless of how the current Canadian government viewed their connection and loyalty to Canada. Thus their perspective in terms of Francis Pegahmagbow would have likely informed their perception of the objective statement.

First Nations perspective in 1918s:
The First Nation’s in 1918 plausibly would have perceived the objective statement to have been caused by Francis Pegahmagabow’s exposure to the Anishinabe hunting skillset and his spirituality. This would have plausibly been the perception of the First Nation since their perspective of their (specifically Anishnabie) hunting skill sets were that they were similar to the ones that snipers would have utilized and that they enabled him to achieve 378 kills and the title as the most deadly sniper of world war 1 since they provided him with extreme amounts of practice, and techniques that were converted to sniping. In addition, because they were perceived as an extremely spiritual society, thus they would tend to thank, and credit what they spiritually believed in for their successes. Thus they would also credit what they, and he spiritually believed in for the occurrence of the objective statement which entails his success, which consists of him amounting 378 kills, and the title as the best sniper in world war 1.

First Nation's Perspective in 1918: The First Nation in 1918’s perception of the objective statement would be oriented around Firstly, how Francis Pegahmagbow deserved the medals that he received, secondly, especially due to his actions his treatment as a First Nation should have been better and equal to the treatment of other people who did similar acts and were considered as Candiand received, and thirdly how the medals were not really meaningful. This would have likely been the First Nation peoples perception of the objective statement because they perceive that his actions would warrant the medals described in the objective statement, that he benefited the Canadian government yet they still treated him poorly, and that he was still his general treatment from the Canadian government was still the same as prior to him receiving the medals described in the objective statement. Meaning that their perspective would have informed them, into perceiving the objective statement in the manner that they would have. Since it shows Firstly, how they perceive his actions to be according to the medals he received, meaning that he deserved the medals, in their perspective, secondly they perceive his treatment from the Candian government to not be according to how he benefited them and thirdly, how since they perceived his treatment prior and post receiving the medals described in the objective statement to be the same, it shows how they would have likely perceived him receiving them to be meaningless

First Nation's Perspective in 1920:
The First Nation in 1920’s perception of the objective statement would have likely been oriented Francis Pegahmagbow being a suburb, and significant leader, and part of the First Nation community. This is presumably their perception because their perspective of him was that he was attempting to improve their quality of life, as well as generally assisting his fellow First Nation s people some of which he is a leader to. By leading for the improvement in their treatment. Thus since they perceive him to be assisting them by leading, they would have a sense of bias which would inform which would make them feel that because he is assisting he is a superb and significant part of the First Nation’s community, and because he is leading and the results may be beneficial for them he is a superb and significant leader in their perspective.

Canadian government’s Perspective in 1925:
The Canadian government in 1925’s perception of the objective statement would have likely been oriented around Francis Pregammagbow’s decision as beneficial for themselves. This would have likely been their perception as it ensures that the First Nation and minority societies are divided and can not collectively rebel against them. Thus the objective statement(his choice) is beneficial towards themselves, meaning that they would have likely perceived the objective statement that is beneficial to them.

Canadian military's Perspective in 1918:
The Canadian military in 1918’s perception of the objective statement would be oriented around how the medals that Francis Pegahmagbow was awarded were deserved. This would have likely been the perspective of the Canadian military because their general perspective in terms of Francis Pegahmagbow was that he fulfilled, as well as exceeded the requirements to receive such medals, thus they would perceive that he deserved the medals that were described in the objective statement. This perception of him is indicated by the Canadian military providing him with all of the medals that were described in the objective statement, without the addition of any external forces. This indicates that the Canadian military believed that he was deserving of them, as otherwise, the Canadian military would not be awarded them to him.

Canadian Soldiers Perspective in 1918:
The majority of the Canadian soldiers who fought with Francis Pegahmagabow in 1918 would have perceived the objective statement to have been caused due to his spiritual beliefs, as they gave him his courage and his ability as a sniper. This likely would have been their perception, due to the fact that France practised a combination of Roman Chalothsim and Anishinaabe spirituality. In addition, since the majority of Canadian soldiers practiced Roman Chalothism, they may have perceived his spirituality with a greater sense of compassion, and bias due to it also being theirs. Thus this perspective would have likely informed their perception such that they perceived his spirituality as the sole provider of his ability as a sniper and courage.

Canadian government's perspective in 1982:
The Canadian government in 1982’s perception of the objective statement would have been oriented around acknowledging the poor treatment of First Nation peoples, and creating a resolution, which would ensure the correct treatment of First Nation s. Correct meaning the way in which legally Canadian citizens were treated. This would be their perception towards the objective statement since during this time the Canadian government’s perspective towards First Nations peoples was that in reality, they were equal to legally acknowledged Canadian citizens, and also deserved to be treated as equals, in Canada. Thus their perspective on the First Nation s would have informed them to agree, with complaints towards the treatment of First Nation s, and to correct and equalize the treatment of First Nations peoples compared to legally Canadian citizens.

First Nation's perspective (negative) in 1925:
The negative First Nation in 1925’s perception of the objective statement would have likely been oriented around how Francis Pregammagbow’s choices completely go against their culture, and as a result, they would perceive his choice negatively. This would have likely been their perception as they perceive all people in their communities as equal Canadians alongside themselves, even the ones who are not in their band or who are mixed race. In addition, they perceive their culture to be generally tolerant and inclusive towards all people. These values which were central to their culture and beliefs were being disregarded by his choice, thus since they are cultural people they would negatively perceive his decision to remove non-band members, and mixed-race individuals, since in a sense his choice is going against who they are as people.

First Nation's Perspective during 1914-1925
The First Nation during 1914 - 1925’s perception of the objective statement would have plausibly been oriented around the statue being a token for exposure to others about their culture and history, including their mistreatment by the Candian government. This would have plausibly been the perception of the First Nation peoples because, from their perspective, it brings awareness to Francis Pegahmagabow’s story, specifically the mistreatment he faced because he was a First Nation. Which could provide additional awareness brought from his likeness, in their perspective.

Canadian military's Perspective during 1914-1925
The Canadian military during 1914 - 1925’s perception of the objective statement would be oriented around Francis Pegahmagabow’s statue being positive and positively spotlighting the Canadian military. This would be their perception of the objective statement because they perceive that the statue illustrates his military efforts, and features other military efforts such as Lieutenant-General Marquis Hainse, in a celebratory manner rather than in a manner that illustrates the military in a negative spotlight. Thus as it does not feature them in a negative spotlight in their perspective it is a positive and a positive spotlight on them. Thus their perspectives around the statue would inform their perception of the objective statement.