Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
ISSUES AND DEBATES - Coggle Diagram
ISSUES AND DEBATES
nature vs nurture
Refers to the extent to which our behaviours are influenced by biological and environmental factors. It isn't a deterministic either/or, it focuses on the interaction between and weighting of the influences
Interactionist approach
The concept that behavior is not down to nature or nurture, but that it is an interaction between the two
For example- In the diathesis-stress model, a genetic vulnerability or predisposition (diathesis) interacts with the environment and life events (stressors) to trigger behaviours or psychological disorders.
-
Evaluation
Strengths
Maguire et al- Found that the area of the brain responsible for spatial memory was larger in London taxi drivers than control group. This suggests their experiences have affected their nature. Plasticity is just one of the complex reasons which means nature vs nurture dichotomy is too simple.
-
Constructivism-
For example naturally aggressive child takes up boxing and becomes more aggressive, makes aggressive friends. This affects environment and subsequently behavior.
Theory which suggests that people create their own environment to suit their nature. (similar to active relationship)
This theory reinforces that it's really difficult to disentangle the influence of nature and nurture and so interactionist is more appropriate
Nurture
-
-
This refers to the influences of interactions, things which are learned through experience both of the social and physical environment.
Bonus fun fact: Empirical research is named like that because it means the research is collected through experience.
Learning theory- Proposes that all behavior is learnt via experience such as conditioning and social learning theory.
Nature
-
Heredity
-
Evolutionary- the characteristics which supported human survival are now innate to us due to natural selection
-
Not the same as characteristics you are born with as these could have been already affected by environment (pre-natal)
-
Evaluation
-
Weaknesses
Hard to study
It is really difficult to measure the extent to which nature and nurture affect behaviour. This is because it is impossible to separate the two to see their individual impacts
Even when looking at twin studies, it is impossible to say that MZ twins are identical because while they genetically are, they will not have experienced identical lives, having different peers, different classes at school and potentially even if they had the exact same life, they could have had different pre-natal environments
Deterministic
Empiricists are environmentally deterministic and nativists are biologically deterministic. Being deterministic has many issues (see determinism evaluation)
-
Epigenetics
Epigenetics studies how different environmental influences actually have the power to change gene expressions in our DNA. Heritable changes.
-
Suggests that infants are not born as blank slates, our own and our ancestors environments can actually influence our genetic makeup
An example of how the environment can affect epigenetics is the Dutch Famine of 1944-1945. Studies show that children who were born during this period have an increased rate of coronary heart disease and obesity. The illnesses occurred because mothers had exposure to famine conditions during pregnancy. Those who never experienced famine faired quite well.
Our ancestors survived by gaining and storing weight to survive periodic famines. That has left our bodies to store fat and gain weight, tendencies that willpower alone can rarely overcome.
-
Reductionism
-
Levels of explanation
-
-
-
Reductionism suggests that explanations start at the highest level and work their way down, looking at component parts
Types of reductionism
Biological
This type reduces behaviour down to a physical level, suggests that its a consequence of biological factors such as neurons neurotransmitters genetics and hormones
-
Environmental
Suggests that all behaviour can be reduced to a simple relationship between behaviour and environment
-
For example, phobias being learnt via an association between an UCS and NS
Suggests that there is no such thing as individualism, what makes everyone 'tick' is essentially the same
-
Ethical implicaions
socially sensitive
It is still important for psychologists to study 'taboo' subjects, they just need to be careful with the distributions of findings and how they are presented
-
Research where there are potential social consequences for either the participants of the people in society which were the target of the investigation
Examples
-
This is important because of one misreported and invalid study on vaccines causing autism supposedly (it doesn't) but its still referenced to this day by idiots
-
-
-
Evaluation
For
Socially sensitive research is necessary- It would be irresponsible for researchers to avoid sensitive topic areas, sometimes by studying an underrepresented group it may promote greater understanding and sensitivity. This can help reduce discrimination and prejudice in society
Practical applications- Socially sensitive research such as attachment could help parents raise children better. Socially sensitive research into racial discrimination could help people treat others better. Socially sensitive research results can benefit society
Against
Current guidelines not appropriate- Current BPS guidelines cover protection from harm of participants during research, but do not control the ways that research could potentially harm those in society. At the moment, researchers do not have any guidelines about how to present their findings to others, which is important with the fast potential spread of misinformation via the internet.
Social control-
The findings of socially sensitive research can be very influential and hard to change once out there, even when there is very little evidence for them or when there's lots of evidence against them.
For example Herrnstein and Murray used psychological research to argue that it was a waste of resources to improve education for disadvantaged communities because they were genetically destined to be low achievers. This shows that socially sensitive can have a wide reach and long term consequences
Psychologist limitations- They can only give a perspective of behavior and can never be truly universal or absolute truth. For example, when diagnosing depression, Psychologists in Japan focus on physical symptoms whereas in the west they focus on emotional symptoms. This shows the subjectivity and variance between psychologists though they all aim to be objective
-
-
free will vs determinism
determinism
-
forms
-
soft determinism
less extreme, believes that humans do have some conscious control over their behaviour
-
the suggestion that we have no free will and that actions and thoughts are predetermined by internal and external factors
types of determinism
biological
-
behaviour is influenced by things we do not observe and aren't conscious of such as neurotransmitters, hormones and genetics
environmental
sees behaviours as influenced by environmental factors such as past experiences and mainly external factors such as teachers or parents
-
-
evaluation
determinism
for
a strength of being able to predict behaviour with a determinist view is that we can also learn cause and effect of negative behaviours and be able to intervene and stop them. for example if we know that certain genes cause aggression we can try to give an individual help before they need it.
Mental illness is determied- We can use the existence of mental illness symptoms to back up determinism. Why would someone with free will choose to feel depressed or suicidal? The fact that medication can alleviate these symptoms suggest that they were biologically determined.
against
socially sensitive- if we are seen as having no control over our behaviour then this contradicts the legal system and suggests that criminals aren't guilty or responsible
self fulfilling prophecy, if someone is deterministically labelled then they may ignore external factors which may influence them and end up becoming what they were determined to be, restrictive attitude
Concordance rates- Concordance rates are never 100%, which shows that behaviour can neither be fully determined biologically or environmentally, this means that determinism ignores the influence of other factors which have been proven to have influence
free will
for
the idea of free will is backed up by the whole legal system, which assumes humans to be responsible for their own behaviour (with exceptions) and this helps maintain order in society
believing in free will has psychological benefits, roberts et al 2000 found that individuals with a high (internal) locus of control tend to be more mentally healthy than those with the view that their life is predetermined and out of their control. these individuals were even more likely to become depressed, this shows that free will can be good for your mental health
against
its culturally relative, because in individualistic cultures free will and independence is favoured, whereas in collectivist cultures, decisions will be made regarding the group and environmental determinism applies more here. therefore the idea is ethnocentric to the west
Conflicting research
Benjamin Libet et al- recorded activity in the motor area of the brain before the person had concious awareness of the decision to more their finger, brain decides first, not you.
Chun Soon et al- found that activity can be recorded in the prefrontal cortex up to 10 seconds before an individual is aware of thier decision to act. shows that our brain can make decisions for us.
free will
acknowledges the fact that we are influenced by biological and environmental factors, but we are able to reject these
-
-
-