Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Is there a solid justification for regarding knowledge in the natural…
Is there a solid justification for regarding knowledge in the natural sciences more highly than another area of knowledge? Discuss with reference to the natural sciences and one other area of knowledge.
Discussion on the title
The title is focusing on developing a supported and valid answer on whether or not natural sciences knowledge is more than in other area of knowledge
The title could be true or not, based on opinions, discussion and facts. As long it is justified through explanation and facts, any answer is valid.
TOK related words
Justification
explanation, arguments, facts
-
Solid
concrete, something that can be prove, certain 100% time
more highly
more valid, more info, more importance, more probable.
-
Points of view
Natural sciences are based on observations so there is a bias in personal perspectives and this is subjectivity.
However, natural sciences can bring up more facts and definite results through scientific method, which is very solid.
-
Counter argument: It is not very exact, many variables. It is always changing
Examples: 
Classic mechanics. In 1600's the theory was developed, and with the evolution of technology, it has been modified and proven to be wrong.
-
-
-