Please enable JavaScript.

Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.

How has the various topics and current events impacted the business world…

- - - - Longshoremen
      - Delivery Drivers
      - Shipping Ports
  - - - Consumers pay more
      - Government gains a bad reputation
      - Businesses may suffer losses
      - Longshoremen work overtime
      - Consumers get their product later
    - - Some of the small company might shut-down
      - Retail selling price rising could decrease the spending demand from consumer
- - - - They have enough power to fix something that can potentially harm us
      - Have rules and regulations on something new in the society
    - - There might be the minimum harm to the ocean
      - In the case of a nuclear war, the environment will be affected as the radioactivity levels will be too high to maintain life
      - Changing the living style of living things.
    - - Humans will suffer the consequences of their actions/inventions
      - Positive or negative
        
        Ex. global warming, nuclear bombs, climate change
      - The ones creating will gain power and popularity
      - People can take advantage of the ease of power
  - - - Before we can further study the idea of space time and space travel, civilization may cease to exist due to the current technology being made here on earth (Nuclear warheads, Bio attacks)
      - The smarter we get with technology, the more people have access to it. If a certain idea/invention falls in the wrong hand, it could lead to catastrophe
    - - Many of us have become obsessed with social media, and it is having an effect on us. While the invention of cars is really damaging the environment right now.
    - - Inventions may also be able to save ourselves from other harmful inventions, it just depends what order they are invented in
      - We can suffer the loss of many people, and it can eventually be the end to all of us
- - - - How much money does it cost in total? Do we have the ability to afford it?
- - - - Governments have to find a affordable and sustainable way to switch over to more eco friendly energy sources to avoid the effects of climate change
    - - We use energy everyday and although it is very helpful to us it also has negative long term effects.
        If we continue to use coal, the global warming crisis will worsen and leave the next generation in a bad spot
    - - We as a society should also know whats better for us
        
        Big companies only want to profit themselves in these situations instead of actually helping. For example, Tesla is selling their cars telling their customers that they are somehow helping fight climate change even though that's not entirely true.
      - Crypto currencies such as bitcoin uses more energy annually than countries such as the United Kingdom
  - - - How does the government make the policy to reduce the possibility of fossil fuels from some companies?
- - - - It will be very difficult for people who aren't working to find work if robots become popular in the world
      - Labour jobs are the easiest for people without education. But labour jobs will be occupied by robots who can do the work better than humans
    - - they will eventually have to make new rules and regulations so its safe for us
      - Will be hard to understand how the tech works and what rules to apply
    - - If businesses can use this tech for simple tasks, they can save lots of money.
      - People could lose jobs and get replaced by robots
    - - They could potentially be out of job
      - Will get replaced by robots who can do the job better and faster, with less mistakes
      - Avoid some health risk
    - - If Tesla can develop this tech, it will be the first and it will be a step forward in the world of AI
      - The way they market/sell it can also have an effect on the future of the world. If the wrong people get it, it could be very bad for humanity
    - - They could abuse the power of A.I for their interest without keeping count of its potential harm to humanity
      - Help with wars and potentially sacrifice robots instead of humans
      - Tech wars
- - - - They are forced to agree with the government or else they get locked up into prison
      - They will suffer long term environmental effects
    - - They will suffer long term environmental effects
    - - Governments like the US would be able to take their naval ships into the black sea which would help out with the Russian/Ukraine conflict.
      - Turkey would be able to charge countries for using their passage
    - - They cost less per the weight of the goods
      - More efficient for them which can save more time and ship more stuff
      - They can save time, but will have to spend money
  - - - $8 billion income a year for the leaders in Turkey
      - It is a risky investment though as greater military powers are involved and might be able to threaten them
      - A possible consequences is war and the destruction of the residents around the area
      - The government also own most of the land around the canal and will end up being one of the only people profiting from the canal
      - More efficient for the ships
      - Less wait time for faster shipping
      - They now have an option to either go for free or pay and
    - - Environment Destruction- Fresh water
      - 80% of Turkish citizens are against the construction of the canal as it is destroys a lot of land
      - Destroys agriculture and destroys animal habitats
      - Land Disputes
      - With the areas where the canal is being built
      - The people of the city might rebel or get angry
      - There is risk of people being unhappy and potentially leaving the area
      - Increased Conflicts
      - Russia will not be happy with Turkey and their relations will diminish
      - The US will be allowed to bring their ships with bigger guns into the Black Sea
- - - - This idea depends a lot on whether average people like the idea or not. Some might think it's animal abuse but some might agree with the doctor/business owner.
      - The average view of death will essentially be gone
    - - They mostly want the best for their citizens and the climate so as long as it's not affecting either one of them in a bad way, they shouldn't have a problem. It's also beneficial for them when big companies are successful in this field since that leads to more jobs opening up.
    - - They are able to fund their research and company from the strong emotions of some people
        They don't care about ethics, as long as they get their money
  - - - Able to potentially clone humans for wars
      - Clone yourself to ‘live a separate life’
      - Also bring back someone you love that you felt didn't have a chance or died in an unfair way or was too young
      - Is this even ethical?
      - What would be considered ethical if anyone could just come back to life?
      - People living forever
      - Who decides who to clone?
      - Only the rich would be able to clone unless it becomes more accessible to the lower class population
    - - Countries that have technology of cloning can profit from others which don’t have this technology.
    - - To bring back the ones you love
      - To preserve unique characteristics of animals
      - The surrogates are not taken proper care of
      - Some of the babies who have birth defects are killed