Experimenting on animals
Introduction
Body
Ending
Experiments are a scientific procedure undertaken to make a discovery, test a hypothesis, or demonstrate a known fact. In fact, 5% of animals used in experiments are protected by law. And that means many people don't agree to experiment on animals and I'm not an exception
Debating
Evidence
Phrases
Agruments
Some chemicals that are ineffective on (or harmful to) animals prove valuable when used by humans.
Animal tests do not reliably predict results in human. And it make a large waste of time and money
Arguments
Evidence
Suffering faced by animals is justified by the immense benefits to humankind. (3)
But 94% of drugs that pass animal tests fail in human clinical trials which waste lots of money and time. Due to that, experimenting on human will take less time to find out the experiments and save more lives compared to the deaths, according to neurologist Aysha Akhtar. (1)
To conclude, experimenting on animals is
Many experiments on animals give out failure and harm for them but become successful when testing on humans. Aspirin, for example, is dangerous for some animal species.
According to neurologist Aysha Akhtar, MD, MPH, over 100 stroke drugs that were effective when tested on animals have failed in humans, and over 85 HIV vaccines failed in humans after working well in animal experiments.
Many human lives can be saved by carrying out experiments on animals beforehand. (1)
Many experiments on animals give out failure and harm for them but become successful when testing on humans. Aspirin, for example, is dangerous for some animal species. (1)
Why don't you test on humans who volunteer, it can give out a better chance of finding the drugs instead of relying on the animals. (2)
a French company is working to bioprint a liver that can test the toxicity of a drug
There are no viable alternatives to experimenting on animals yet. There are some alternatives like computer models, cell culture method, but they are not providing results that animal research provide. (2)
What do you mean is justified by the immense benefits to humankind? Why do they have to sacrifice themselves for human instead of their species? It will be reasonable if you say
suffering faced by humans is justified by the immense benefits to humankind. (3)
Animal research has contributed to 70% of Nobel prizes for physiology and medicine. Without animal research, many medical inventions wouldn’t be implemented successfully. (4)
To begin with, Next, Last but not least,...
Furthermore, Moreover, Additionally,...
Firstly, Secondly, Thirdly,....
The type of animal that is most often experimented by scientists is usually a mouse, also known as a guinea pig.It is completely normal to use them too much in experiments and we are not afraid of them going extinct because the mice give birth about 5 to 8 times a year. (5)
So why don't we use the human to experiments because there are 385,000 babies are born a day (5)
Technological advancements in 3D printing allow the possibility for bioprinting:
Beginning
Experiments are a scientific process which help to find out the use or effect, test a hypothesis or demonstrate a known fact. In fact, there are only 5% of animals used in experiments protected by law. And that means why most people disagree with experiments on animals and so do I.
Body
Conclusion
Evidence
Arguments
According to neurologist Aysha Akhtar, MD, MPH, over 100 stroke drugs and 85 HIV vaccines that were effective when tested on animals have failed in humans. Due to that, experimenting directly on humans will take less time to find out the drugs and save more lives compared to the deaths
Animal genes are absolutely not the same as humans, so that's why there are lots of drugs that pass successfully on animals but turn out to be failed when applied to people.
It’s an unuseful death for those animals which have to put up with it when they can't even contribute anything to the medical but have to die wastefully.
There are some chemicals that are ineffective on or harmful to animals that prove valuable when used by humans. Aspirin, for example, is dangerous for some animal species.
people say: ‘suffering faced by animals is justified by the immense benefits to humankind’. What do you mean is justified by the immense benefits to humankind? Why do they have to sacrifice themselves for humans instead of their species? It will be reasonable if you say suffering faced by humans is justified by the immense benefits to humankind.
a mouse which is also known as a guinea pig is usually used in experiments. They have a high birth production which gives birth about 5 to 8 times a year so most people say that we don't have to worry of them going extinct. But if you think that way, why don't we use humans to experiment because 385,000 babies are born a day.