Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
For artists and natural scientists, which is more important: what can be…
For artists and natural scientists, which is more important: what can be explained or what
cannot be explained? Discuss with reference to the arts and the natural sciences.
PT No 2: May 2023
- (a) Who is the artist in context-
A person who creates or performs the art, art may or may not have a certain meaning. Maybe the artist is performing a physical art (dancing or cultural ritual) that needs direct interpretation from specific audiences, different from the one in the form of painting or non-living arts.
(b) Who is the natural scientist in context -
An individual or organization that seeks the truth or basic justification to discover laws of nature. Maybe to prove discovered basic rules or newly discovered basic rules.
- What can or can't be considered as arts?
-
-
- Can or can't means that its either one
Can be explained - we have proof on how such things happened and we can give example and such
Can't be explained - there is no physical way to prove it, maybe only in terms of theory but we can't prove it
OR
can't be explained - the way it is, no hidden science behind it, like life after death???
-
- Which one is more important?
Personally, things that can't be explained is more important, it is because it might lead to misinterpretation of something where it might in general can't be explained, but there are some guidance that can be given in order to understand that knowledge
-
- What can or can't be considered as natural science?
benda yang bukan natural phenomena maksudnya bukan physical world related
Natural sciences - natural phenomenon? or natural reaction of abnormal phenomenon (man-made)
-
can't be explained is more important - lead to further research - new knowledges might get acquired
(important for future)
-
In the process of acquiring the unexplainable, ada new knowledge
-
-
-
-
-
-