Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
the S-SFM performance results were good, but accidents still happened -…
the S-SFM performance results were good,
but accidents still happened
Discrepant S-SFM self assessment by suppliers’ S-SFM expertise
Identify the score more difficult.
Check points criterial not clear
Redundant check items
Not reflex workplace safety
Check items not cover
Almost document check
Random some check items
Assess only low score of check items
TDEM not check items which high score
Get documents and info from some functions, area
Not daily audit all operators, area
Insufficient SFM expertise person for all area
Low SFM expertise expansion ratio
High score of check items no need attach evidence
Suppliers' S-SFM expertise miss understanding
Check items more difficult to understand
Check points criterial not clear
Not attend S-SFM online training
New P.I.C don't know how to learn
Previous P.I.C didn't instruct
No work instruction
Lack of TDEM contacting
TDEM don't know there are resigned person
TDEM not follow up suppliers who not yet submit S-SFM
Lack of manpower
No intent to learn
TDEM no record system
Lack of supplier’ s expertise capability
Not good training content
English language
Not enough sample case
Not clear explanation
Not god exam method
Can copy exam answer
Group examination at selected factory
Low frequently exam
Spending high resources
Group examination at selected factory
Incorrect S-SFM assessment confirmation by TDEM
Not cross check
can’t GEMBA to audit all suppliers, all plants
Lack of man power
Wrong select suppliers audit
No standard escalation procedure
Don't know high suppliers risk
Not visualize high suppliers’ hazard risk
No suppliers’ hazard risk data & status
Suppliers don't attach evidence for checking
No standard timing for evidence attachment of each check items
Still get score even suppliers not attach evidence
Identify the score more difficult.
Check points criterial not clear
Redundant check items