Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Framing Deaf Studies: The Deaf Convert Culture and It's Lesson for…
Framing Deaf Studies: The Deaf Convert Culture and It's Lesson for Deaf Theory
Deaf Studies
personification stories
"are a native mode of ontological critique"
they are studied in seeing and valuing the world differently, and it narrating lives that cannot speak for themselves
the ability to understand and relate to, and ultimately give voice to, these objects' particular kind of postiion in the world, and to do so in front of others with great thoroughness and skill
Deaf Theory
thought of "converts" because not all are born to signers
convert culture, with narrtive forms that function differently than those of most cultures with which we are familiar
ABC stories
antagonist is the storyteller
polar opposite to personification stories
penetrate and masters constraints
deaf disenfranchisement
Deaf narratives is at the core of Deaf studies
Johnston's pinball story
reveals a dynamic of deaf story telling that is highly relevant to the formulation of Deaf Theory
the goal of Deaf Studies is presumably interrogating
A major aim of Deaf Studies should be the cultivation, collection, cataloging, aesthetically effective translation, and ready distribution of deaf narrative materials
"what does it mean to be an American Citizen?"
interesting statement: "puts the natural order of things into question"
the deaf are ideologically construed as disabled
constraints:
must have objects of study
must have student
must have place to take classes
students must have job upon graduation
dicourse of linguistics, anthropology, literary theory, literacy theory, multiculturalism, etc.
deaf public voice
discover
claim
deaf signers value
deaf people doing the talking
reach a deaf audience
Deaf Studies is disadvantaged position