Geoeconomics in the context of restive regional powers

Geoeconomics

Associated with Luttwak

Detonated the successor system of interstate rivalry after Cold War

Crucial, understudied aspect

Perspective

Geopolitical

Unipolar World = USA undisputed hegemon

Geoeconomic

US Dominance on decline

Rising powers: China, Brazil, India

Emerging powers = Soft Balancing

Liberalism 3.0 (Ikenberry)

Contries like china must accept aspects of a neoliberal world

Geoeconomics tends to be yuxtaposed with geopolitics

Geoeconomics theorizing is still infant

3 recent theoretical approaches

1

2

3

Critical Constructivist Perspective

Economic Geographics Approach

Geoeconomics as a Statecraft

Economic

Financial

Energy

Richard Young

"use of statecraft for economic ends; a focus on relative economic gain and power; a concern with gaining control of resources; the enmeshing of state and business sectors; and the primacy of economic over other forms of security"

View is state-centric

Closest to the traditional view

Related to the more tradicional academic disciplines of political and economical geography that study the effects of geographic features on the organization of politics or the economy

Shows how the economic geography of South America limit Brazil´s sphere of dominance

(Cowen and Smith)

Close connection between political space and understandings of it

Critical Geography camp

How economics operates and becomes entrenched in state practice

Us dominance provides a "new disciplining architecture" for financial and ideological policing, replacing mechanisms of colonial administration

Geoeconomics encompasses a way of being the world in which strategies come to be seen as plausible and desirable

Mikael Wigell

Geoeconomics is the strategic use of economic power

strategic frame (competitive or cooperative)

Economic Power (goal or means)

4 ideal types of strategies

neo-mercantilism

liberal-institutionalism

neo-imperialism

hegemony

In summary

wielding geoeconomic can be more complicated than geopolitical power

intermediate actors needed as geoeconomic means are hard to control and get them to pull in the same direction.

In deepening our understanding of geoeconomics, we need to probe into the interconnections between space, politics and economics