Please enable JavaScript.

Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.

Policy Presentation, Policy Adoption Anderson (2014) suggests that the…

- - - - Policy Legitimation
        
        Are some viewpoints less desirable than others?
        
        Benade - policy has to find flesh
        “Watching everyday is not a good message to my teachers”
      - Policy Adoption
        
        Policy Instruments
        
        Lowi - Regulatory
        
        McDonell & Elmore - mandate
        Where to draw the line?
        
        Policy Implementation
        
        Obstruction
        
        Policy Evaluation
        
        Recommendations
        
        Codifying the policy
        
        Who, how, when can the footage be used?
        
        Systematic evaluation
        
        Politically-designed, or public relations evaluation
        
        Objective
        Safety of students, teachers etc. - is our policy achieving its objective?
        
        Main type of evaluation is done for accreditation - politically designed. Focus on outputs not outcomes
        
        Mostly anecdotal evidence
        
        Some parents have expressed feeling disconnected
        
        Deterrence, cause and effect - difficult to systematically evaluate
        
        360 view espoused, but is this really the case?
        
        Appropriateness of policy - alignment with school’s vision (people of integrity) and (leaders - placing trust in teachers in their classrooms). Small school with high teacher to student ratio, small premises.
        
        Equity - students can feel safe in common areas such as lockers and playgrounds, teachers feel trusted and supported, admin have ensured enough coverage to be confident the policy is achieving its aims
        
        Teacher motives - not an invasion of privacy
        
        Teacher capacity
        relies on teachers having the skills to ensure a safe and positive climate in the classroom, to remove obstacles to safety. Capacity built through PD (sponsored and required certification processes, regularly scheduled PLCs x2)
        
        As it is a private institution this policy was never put out for public debate or teacher input
        
        Informal policy with no reference in the text - this could be a way to remove the issue from the agenda and reduce debate?
        
        RCT
        CCTV discussed ad nauseum
        Importance of problem - social agenda topic, goals for institution, possible alternatives and consequences examined, small leadership team with power of decision making
      - Policy interdependency
      - How was the policy framed?
        What message are we trying to convey? Vaules of trust and honesty, or fear and suspicion?
      - Leadership team and the process as it filters through to the stakeholders
      - Not codifed - barrier to comment
- - - - 190 - Furthermore, these different target groups are expected to receive disproportionate shares of either policy benefits or policy burdens.
        In a nutshell, it is argued that different patterns of instrument choice exist, and that they vary with the social constructions and power of target groups.
- - - - Is the inducement that by continuiing to demonstrate commitment to safety then cameras are not needed?