Please enable JavaScript.

Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.

Keywords & Learning - Coggle Diagram

- - - - The contextual level consists of ‘global forces’, think about: economic development, demographics, politics, technological developments and social developments. Foresight Cards – STEEP edition focusses on external forces that address the contextual level.
    - - The transactional level consists of ‘market forces’, think about: suppliers, supply and demand, distribution, competitors and strategic alliances.
    - - The organizational level involves forces that address the internal environment of the firm. Think about: vision, mission, strategy, resources, processes, products and services.
- - - - 4 ingredient transitions
        
        reframe the problem
        
        visions/ visioning
        
        experiment/ experimenting
        
        multiactor dynamics
      - Accelerate Transitions
        
        Transformative solutions
        
        Green walls
        
        coloured rubbish bins
        
        waste as a resource- circular economy
        
        innovative policy
        
        nation unity/ community engagement
        
        sustainability development goals
        
        governance capacity
        
        bikes in city not cars
        
        garden/ urban agriculature
      - Main Topics
        
        Low carbon transitions in everyday life
        
        Transform cities with nature
        
        Cities are major actors in facilitating sustainable transitions
        
        Science has a major role in transformative change
        
        evidence based
        
        innovation
        
        trialled and realised
        
        "people and technology together for a better world" Swinburne uni mission statement
  - - - mitigation
      - adaptation
      - suffering
    - - temp change based on surfaces nearby.
      - main driver of outdoor comfort
      - change on time of day and height of surrounds
    - - protect rom direct wind
    - - more sky means more cooling at night
      - trees block sky: more heat kept below canopy
    - - back pack with tech, app/human experience, lazer/thermal camera
    - - need high wind to see difference
      - underestimates effect
    - - interact with human movement and activity
    - - densify the urban environment
      - hard and soft perormances
      - integrated functions rather than seperate uses
      - parking for only half the residents to encourage walking, bikes and public transport
      - most vibrant activity towards docklands area
      - river pulls the heart of the neighbourhood towards its bank
  - - - The point of living in the city is to feel the buzz, vibrance. its very different to rural
      - define existing and proposed character
      - reduce noise and unwanted acoustic effects
      - introduce wanted sounds and acoustic effects
      - design considerations
        
        preferred usage and operational flexibility
        
        expected activity in the public realm
        
        residential acoustics amenity
        
        feasabiliy of residential controls
    - - Introduction
        
        • “rescue previous developments” (Page 2158)
        
        • “attract investment through image making” as many other countries and cities has successful waterfront developments. (Page 2158)
        
        • “relationship between city and water” (Page 2159)
        
        • “strong argument that waterfront developments are not substantially different from any other form of urban development” (Page 2159)
        
        • “unique destination and safe investment opportunity” (Page 2159)
        
        • “high end commercial and residential” (Page 2159)
        
        • ” building for sustainability, with new urbanism, compact cities, smart growth and transit cities now occupying the pinnacle of international ‘best practice’.” (Page 2160)
        
        • ‘‘that meets needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations’’ (WCED, 1987, p. 43). (Page 2160)
        
        • Toronto waterfront development‘‘clean, green and attractive . usable, diverse, open and connected . affordable and accessible to the public’’ (Sandercock and Dovey, 2002, p. 152). (Page 2161)
        
        • “opportunity for incremental growth, housing affordability and social diversity in the context of a growing population…pinned by principles of social equity and sound environmental management.” (Page 2162)
        
        • Dockland develeopment meant to “vision” “sustainability… economic, environmental, social and culture aspects.” (Page 2158)
      - 1990-1999
        
        o Plans for redevelopment of docklands from industrial.
        
        o Divided into 7 parcels and sold off for extremely low prices.
        
        o Sports stadium was the beginning to try and get people in and develop the area.
        
        o 35m height limit but proposal for 560m building to get Melbourne on the wprld stage
      - 2000-2005
        
        o Development of new roads to get projects built and connect to the city center
        
        o New quay precinct first to build with low rise height restrictions.
        
         MAB 80m heigh constructions 66m too high over suggested 14m limit.
        
         Shadowing northern prominard
        
        o “Victoria harbor become the social and civic heart of Docklands” (Page 2165)
        
        o “ESD guide for natural lighting, using space for cooling, fresh air circulation and ventilation, river cooling and underfloor air conditioning, solar power and storm water collection.” (page 2667)
      - 2005-2009
        
        Book of docklands to show history
        
        Spectacular. Creating Melbourne Docklands The People's Waterfront
        
        o Vision of creative city
        
        o Sustainability- social, economic, environmental
        
        o “expensive commercial and residential area” (Page 2169)
        
        o Struggle to add affordable housing developmets
        
        o Public-private partnerships no government support
        
        o In 2008 estimated worth 12 billion aud. 3300 apartments, 600 residents, 15000 workers, 400000m2 of commercial space, 40 new buildings, 11 green start rated environmentally sustainable buildings, 57 social housing units.
        
        o “at the micro level it doesn’t work.” Lord Mayor (Page 2171)
        
        o “Within a decade it will be finished” (Page 2171)
      - 2010
        
        o Halfway point of building phase
        
        o “creative spaces program” derived from ‘housing the arts’ (page 2173)
        
        o “Victoria Hoarbour would contain moments of interest and surprise” (Page 2173)
      - conclusion
        
        o Neoliberalism characterised by failure
    - - open up urban environment
      - voxel
      - case studies
        
        gordon matta clark, conical intersect
        
        steven holl, sliced porocity block
        
        jean renaudie, housing complex ivry-sur-seine
        
        MVRDV, WoZoCo
      - possibility of stacking lego blocks
      - measure porocity
      - benefits of porocity
        
        natural lighting
        
        open up space
        
        exterior habitable space/ terraces
      - voids/ terraces
      - http://thewhyfactory.com/project/porous-city/
      - https://issuu.com/nai010publishers/docs/sneak_preview
- - - - How people connect at street
        
        podium building- creates a podium infrastructure for people to connect what senses at street level. differ to unit and inside?
    - - users
      - age
      - counrty of origin
      - activities
      - work profile
    - - social
      - historic
      - environmental
      - economical
      - political
      - physical
      - technological
  - - - Sensory
      - Covid lockdowns
      - performance analysis