Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
2021 10 Pisces 2022 proposal(s), Legend: - Coggle Diagram
2021 10 Pisces 2022 proposal(s)
Char, Liz, Nicki, Ashlyn
:pencil2: 1. Practitioner engagement in CREE
Portal training
In person training with evaluators
Teaching for equity consciousness (SKLRA 2014)
Bridgers who are practitioners but have good experience and interest :silhouettes:
Present at affiliate and other conferences
Howard Hughes network as a model. more and less experienced evaluation/practitioners collaborate. "Peer clusters"
Changescale as a model?
:pencil2: 2. Portal updates and curation
Provides scaffolding to create NICs among pracvtitioner organizartions
Provides scaffolding to create CoPs among practitioners
:pencil2: 3. Evaluation collaboration
Networked improvement communities (NICs)
Collective evaluation
:check: PI Anchor - Practitioner, Portal, Collective Eval
The So What: Raising the practice of all voices
Partners
EBLN (Clemson and Va Tech
NAAEE
New NIC and CE partners
Rock the Boat NYC
Impact NC
Kathryn, Post-doc
Primary Goals
:pencil2: 2. Emerging EE evaluators
Path could include workng with practitioners as a training tool
Cross work: EE and CREE
Building EE knowledge and capacity
Building CREE knowledge and capacity
Bite-sized evaluation jobs
Mentoring support from established evaluators :silhouettes:
Mirrror or merge with AEA GEDI model?
:pencil2: 1. Engage established evaluators
Develop CoP :silhouettes:
The So What: If Eval improves programming, it follows that more CRE eval and evaluators can support programs to become more culturally responsive.
Cross work: EE and CREE
Building EE knowledge and capacity
Building CREE knowledge and capacity
:pencil2:3. Bridgers
Definition: Practitioners who have good experience and interest :silhouettes:
Leaders and influencers
:pencil2: 4. Funders
Engage as drivers and thought partners
Working towards more equitable EE practices
How to build systemic capacity building into/for EE evaluation
Funding and support beyond $$
Inviting funders to help lead this goal
Partners
Steve Braun primary partner
Developing new partners
Cat Stylinski and Joe Heimlich b/c of CoP expertise
AEA, particularly AEA GEDI staff?
have xxx (2?) students at each of xx institutions to go through
GEDI
program
:check: PI Anchor - Evaluator Capacity Building
Integrative components
Integrative and strategic support for the field
Pools emerge in each stakeholder category, and then form their own CoP as desired and relevant
Participatory approaches throughout
Structure
Extension
Evaluation planning
Develop initial metrics and methods for project evaluation
Jan- June 2022, <$50k? All requested funds for base grant
Targeted community engagement --> broader engagement
Networking with CREE evaluators in preparation for COP
Networking with funding partners
Networking with community-specific groups
How are CREE professionals understanding EE?
Begin recruiting for different audience groups for all PIs
ID target invite list for NCSU stakeholders
Engage with speciality/subject-area experts
Beginning tgo engage emerging and bridging evaluators
How do we partner with foundations to make the case for supportive mechanisms
NCSU Post-doc recruitment
Va Tech: manuscript based on work in the addendum, and next steps planning towards a sustainable evaluation network
Included: Duke, Braun, DEI team, NAAEE, Va Tech
Duke to find additional NCSU funding for period from addendum grant
Continued portal additions, edits, refinements
Continue to follow NIC and CE case studies
"Attending" conferences as possible to promote portal
In-person meeting of partners?
2022 Proposal
July 2022 start request; initial draft by end of 2021
NCSU, Duke, and AUNE separate budgets, but consolidated proposal
Articulate high-level timeline 2018 - 2028
"Star" points of synergy
:check: Goal: ** Note on leadership: We expect the leadership team to broaden if not fully change by the end of this grant period (6/2024). Our goal is to meaningfully and respectfully engage community-specific institutions and individuals with diverse identities throughout this project. Recognizing the importance of mediating power differentials in order to truly include people/organizations, current Principal Investigators would step aside from primary leadership in order to support newly engaged leaders, both from frontline and historically underrepresented communities. This is one example of how our project team expects to operationalize inclusive efforts with communities underrepresented or often excluded from the field of EE.
Process to achieve
How to transition history and data
Should someone or insitution be constant?
Develop (flexible) goals and objectives for 6/2022-6/2024
Questions :question:
How to engage current partners not named here
AWE
COCO
Thrive Outside
Clarify separation of proposal and project efforts
How do we organize so that we are not contributing to separation or silos, but rather to integration
How to clearly show collaboration among 3 PI groups
What are our evaluatoin paths for this work
Impact on students and audiences
More evaluators with more capacity
Other outcomes?
Karyl interested in this "branch"
CR eval will lead to more equitable EE
Jean, Libby
Partners
Developing new DEI partners
CREA Hawaii
Spirit Brooks interested in continuing
University of Oregon Leilani Sabzalian
Sandra Ayoo
at UNC Greensboro (happens to also be Noelle's primary PhD advisor)
Ayesha Boyce
at ASU (formerly UNC-G)
Karyl Askew primary partner
:check: PI Anchor - DEI
Supporting DEI with Duke and NCSU
eeVAL recruitment campaign to journey on JEDIS+A
Applicants
EE program providers
CREE practitioners
Evaluators with active or new eval project
Networks?
Criteria
self-motivation
demonstrated interest to advance JEDIS+A
Benefits to applicants
funding for evaluation
funding for engagement
in-group and cross-group professional learning
sessions
workshops
convenings
3 universities as network weavers and capacity builders
Legend:
:check: Goals
:pencil2: Objectives
:silhouettes: Collaborative activities
