Knowledge outputs
COMM
Develop Comm skills for expert (HR in charge Comm not very on top of the process in the loop
Knowledge strategy - What knowledge? Small org vs big competitors (WB, OECD, ..) , where to position ETF
How to package our knowledge - new ways
SPA
Inventory of valuable k products (documentation)
Increase budget on pubblication due to Covid, less on events, how do we measure the impact on that?
Multipliers of knowledge (for ex ILO network) - Weakness on intellectual creation and leaders in the field
Vincent: before rushing to strategy many other things to work out
comments
comm strat org we are not yet there - other silos
not yet ready on strategy, more things to do
One ETF means not only towards inside but toward outside
change of culture in terms of the organisation and individuals
lack of confidence or competence of staff (experts) in writing? including contributing to social media?
on one side reluctance of experts to synthetise (ego issue) + lack of confidence and unsecurity + people like/need time and they don't have time + people are unsecure because they feel criticised (by comm) so ther is a culture (it's obscure, its academy...) and people cnfidence is bashed around
make a distinction between content worth + marketing of content
as recruited as an expert for me it was obvious that I had to write, and to foster this confidence one key thing is exposure for example through social media - being exposed on new things is crucial otherwise we became dinosaurs
for whom do we create content? corporate conference was practically for insiders and close friends
RU
Our conversation on KM and KS, not KC
And sharing with other organisations
the work with other agencies, SRD, strong networks and lots of reference materials - space to enlarge cooperation for example with environm Agency and our green project
SID
K generation is to be made explicit as a task in the pas
Vincent does not agree that K generation to be put in the performance objectives, we need more time
culture that kill the organisation
3 things
people: being a team and bring this concept in team, change the language, we have an internal tendency to destroy people we have to be strong against that
knowledge strategy. position adn products coem up with some models to avoid repeting braistorming aamong the house
to diminisg the numebr of activities
be more precise with time allocation, time recording is not a joke - using now as it is is a joke
do some text, experiment, go on social media
culture of destrying people: differentiate that people have to be robust enough to defend their position
MAP
Whom we work
peer and other with a steering role
have by the end of the year having the same MINDMAP of knowledge in house
design user experience is an issue?
CM say they package everything in IMAGE then it is not used
What is success? A single approach may not be very successful, try to reconcile, ahve one common approach but not situation where one size fit all
PC are not represented in the map
do things in a way that free time to allow us to be outward looking and not inside looking