Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH - Coggle Diagram
QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
PRECONCEIVED DESIGN
CONDITIONS FOR THE COMPARISONS REQUIRED TO TEST HYPOTHESES
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS TO MAKE MEANINGFUL INTERPRETATION
CLASSIFY EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN 1
SINGLE-VARIABLE DESIGN
FACTORIAL DESIGNS
CLASSIFY EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN 2
PRE EXPERIMENTAL
ONE GROUP PRETEST-POSTTEST DESIGN
THREE STEPS
ADMINISTERING A PRETEST MEASURE DV
APPLYING EXPERIMENTAAL TREATMENT X TO SUBJECTS
ADMINISTERING A POSTTEST, MEASURING THE DV
STATIC GROUP COMPARISON
TRUE EXPERIMENTAL
RANDOMIZED SUBJECTS, POSTTEST-ONLY CONTROL GROUP DESIGN
SOLOMON THREE-GROUP DESIGN
SOLOMON FOUR GROUP DESIGN
QUASI EXPERIMENTAL
NONRANDOMIZED CONTROL GROUP, PRETEST-POSTTEST DESIGN
COUNTERBALANCED DESIGN
ONE-SHOT CASE STUDY
EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH
VARIABLES ARE MANIPULATED (IV)
AND OBSERVED (DV)
TESTED WITH QUANTITATIVE MEASURE
MANIPULATES ONE OR MORE INDEPENDENT VARIABLE
CONTROL (HELD CONSTANT)
EFFECT ON DEPENDENT VARIABLE
QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH
STATISTICALLY REGRESSION
EXTREMELY HIGH OR EXTREMELY LOW SCORES
DIFFERENTIAL SELECTION OF PARTICIPANTS
GROUP WERE DIFFERENT BEFORE THE STUDY EVEN BEGINS
MORTALITY
SELECTION-MATURATION INTERACTION
INSTRUMENTION
INRELIABILITY OR LACK OF CONSISTENCY
EXPERIMENTER EFFECT
UNINTENTIONAL EFFECT
SUBJECT EFFECT
TYPE OF EXPERIMENTAL COMPARISONS
COMPARISONS OF TWO APPROACHES/VARIABLES
COMPARISONS OF NEW AND EXISTING APPROACH
COMPARISONS DIFFERENT AMOUNTS OF A SINGLE APPROACH
THREATS TO EXPERIMENTAL VALIDITY
INTERNAL VALIDITY
HIGH DEGREE OF INTERNAL VALIDITY CONCLUDE
STRONG EVIDENCE OF CAUSALITY
LOW INTERNAL VALIDITY CONCLUDE LITTLE OR NO EVIDENCE OF CAUSALITY
EXTERNAL VALIDITY
THREATS TO EXTERNAL VALIDITY
GENERALIZING TO WHOM
GENERALIZING TO WHAT
EXTRANEOUS VARIABLES
COUNFOUNDING VARIABLE INFLUENCE
THE DEPENDENT VARIABLE
COMPETING EXPLANATION
OCCUR BETWEEN PRE & POST MEASUREMENT OF THE DV
GREATER TIME LAPSE, THE GREATER OF THE
POSSIBILITY OF HISTORY BECOME A RIVAL EXPLANATION
HOW TO CONTROL
RANDOMIZED MATCHING
HOMOHENEOUS SELECTION
ANCOVA
CONTROL GROUP
THE OTHER GROUP INVOLVED IN THE EXPERIMENT
CONCEPT OF CONTROL
REMOVE ANY EXTRANEOUS VARIABLE
TO INDICATES THE DIFFERENVE IN DV ONLY DUE TO IV
THREATS TO EXPERIMENTAL VALIDITY
PARTICIPANTS VARIABLE
CHARACTERISTICS OF PARTICIPANTS
ENVIRONMENTAL VARIABLES
EXPERIENCES PARTICIPANTS
HISTORY
SOME ANTICIPATED EVENT OCCUR DURING EXPERIMENT WAS IN PROGRESS
PASSAGE OF TIME
CONCEPT OF MANIPULATION
SELECT THE NUMBER/TYPE OF TREATMENT
AND RANDOMLY ASSIGN THE PARTICIPANTS
EXPERIMENTAL GROUP
GROUPS THAT RECEIVE THE TREATMENT
MATURATION
DV CHANGE DUE TO NORMAL DEVELOPMENTAL PROCESSES WITH SUBJECT AS A FUNCTION OF TIME
TESTING
IMPROVED SCORES ON NA POSTTEST AS A RESULT HAVING PRETEST