Please enable JavaScript.

Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.

How does critical pedagogy reveal and confront the role that schooling…

- - - - IQ testing
        
        Forms American values of intelligence/ determines who is set up for success
        
        High IQ=more opportunity (power and privilege)
        
        Testing subjective by nature
        
        Testing in English only
        
        Students “tracked” based on outcome of score (labeled for life)
      - Belief that ethnicity affects intelligence…
        
        Ability to learn was undermined, potential of students not valued
        
        Students being labeled as slow learners, mentally retarded (heavily hispanic/latino)
        
        students with "significant" disabilities institutionalized; unable to participate in public education
        
        teachers are given huge job of differentiating without support/proper pay
        
        job of teachers undervalued and underfunded
        
        intersectionality amongst students of color/immigrant/native peoples AND disability
        
        no critical thinking for marginalized groups
      - Black schooling
        
        division of genders; girls become the "help" (domesticated work) and boys doing labor
    - - immigrant populations primarily working in factories
      - College Bound
        
        white, middle-upper class, affluent students
      - Career Tracking
        
        Very gendered based on "appropriate" career path
  - - - patriotism, and American citizenship
        
        American Holiday's apart of curriculum (Columbus Day)
        
        beginning of skewed view of world/U.S history
        
        American (white) savior ship
      - putting assimilation to work (americanize immigrant children)
        
        native American assimilation camps
      - Christianity (The Bible) present in public education
- - - - Health and hygiene are subjective by different groups (cultural difference)
        
        differentiated content by gender