Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Обзор литературы vac hesitance/vac resistance - Coggle Diagram
Обзор литературы vac hesitance/vac resistance
V important because of herd imminity
High vaccine uptake s provides direct protection for vaccinated individuals, but also induce indirect protection (herd immunity) for the overall community.
Undervaccinated individuals tend to cluster together, leading to increased transmission of VPD
The SAGE Working Group on Vaccine Hesitancy
importance of understanding the specific concerns of the various groups of vaccine-hesitant individuals, as an effective “one size fits all” intervention is unlikely ever to exist.
Models of vaccine hesitancy
On the meso-level, the SAGE working group proposed in their model that individual/social influences, contextual influences and vaccine and vaccination-specific issues play a role
It is further broken down and described as being “influenced by factors such as complacency, convenience and confidence”
Definition
SAGE: vaccine hesitancy refers to delay in acceptance or refusal of vaccination despite availability of vaccination services. Vaccine hesitancy is complex and context specific, varying across time, place and vaccines. It is influenced by factors such as complacency, convenience and confidence.
vaccine hesitancy (a term that includes the concepts of indecision, uncertainty, delay and reluctance)
complex, closely linked to social contexts, and has different determinants: historical period, geographical area, political situation, complacency, convenience and confidence in vaccines
The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that vaccine hesitancy and any proxy of it should be constantly monitored
determinants of individual decision-making about vaccination
barriers to vaccine uptake can be very different in kind and significance, with regard to the vaccine and disease in focus
rhetorical strategies that denialists use for persuasion in the veracity of their views
Information campaigns
and public health interventions, which use the Internet as a delivery platform
audience targeting and segmentation techniques should be used to increase effectiveness of such interventions
antivaccination movement, have been the object of extensive scientific research [3-5,8,9]
Kata A. A postmodern Pandora’s box: anti-vaccination misinformation on the Internet. Vaccine 2010;28(7):1709-1716.
Wilson K, Keelan J. Social media and the empowering of opponents of medical technologies: the case of anti-vaccinationism. J Med Internet Res 2013;15(5):e103 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
Wolfe RM, Sharp LK. Vaccination or immunization? The impact of search terms on the internet. J Health Commun 2005 Sep;10(6):537-551.
Zimmerman RK, Wolfe RM, Fox DE, Fox JR, Nowalk MP, Troy JA, et al. Vaccine criticism on the World Wide Web. J Med Internet Res 2005;7(2):e17
Wolfe RM. Vaccine safety activists on the Internet. Expert Rev Vaccines 2002 Oct;1(3):249-252.
WHO Guide to Tailoring Immunization Programmes
Interventions are most likely to succeed when they are based on empirical data and situational assessment – both to have a detailed level of understanding of the vaccine hesitancy situation (susceptible populations, key determinants of vaccination, barriers and enabling conditions, etc.) and to properly evaluate the impact of the intervention [70].
World Health Organization The guide to tailoring immunization programmes (TIP) Regional Office for Europe (2013), p. 79
E. Dubé, M. Vivion, N.E. MacDonald
Vaccine hesitancy, vaccine refusal and the anti-vaccine movement: influence, impact and implications Expert Rev Vaccines (2014), pp. 1-19
E. Dube, C. Laberge, M. Guay, P. Bramadat, R. Roy, J.A. Bettinger Vaccine hesitancy: an overview Hum Vaccin Immunother, 9 (8) (2013), pp. 1-11
P. Streefland, A.M.R. Chowdhury, P. Ramos-Jimenez Patterns of vaccination acceptance
Soc Sci Med, 49 (12) (1999), pp. 1705-1716