Please enable JavaScript.

Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.

John Logue, Pinto - Coggle Diagram

- - - - navigation
      - deep seabed
- - - - believed in the benefit to human race not one nation
      - a modern day Grotius would not accept the exploitation by one state
- - - - suspicious developing and developed states
    - - Pardo did not see the LOSC as a just outcome
- - - - freedom of navigation
    - - mare liberum means free sea not freedom of the seas
        
        grotius recognised the sovereignty of a coastal state could extend to an adjacent belt of sea
- - - - ie amendment of convention, elect members for the Int tribunal law of the sea
      - systems of weighted voting based on budgetary contribution were proposed but not adopted
  - - - ie living resources of EEZ art 63-67
      - conservation of living resources in high seas art 117-120.
      - piracy, drug trafficking, illegal broadcasting art 197, 199, 200 and 201
      - cooperation - states bordering enclosed or semi enclosed seas - art 123
      - marine technology transfer art 266 and 270-2
      - seabed regime BNJ part XI
        
        common heritage principles adopted without dissent
    - - LOSC recognises a spectrum of jurisdictions - reconcile coastal state concerns with maritime powers
    - - must exercise freedoms in accordance with the law and with due regard to the interests of others
  - - - "there is no finer expression of Grotius' legacy to be found in the modern law of the sea than the provisions of the new Convention which deal with the settlement of disputes." p45