Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
U8 A2 - Coggle Diagram
U8 A2
P7 Factors that underpin crime reduction strategies
Increase/Change in crime rate
Increase in terrorism threat level
Changes in legislation
Technology
Re-offending rates
Public confidence decrease
Drivers for crime - Opportunity, Profit
Increased housing
Problem analysis triangle
M3 Advantages and disadvantages of multi agency working
Better lines of communication
Information sharing
MARAC and MAPPA
Shared knowledge/intelligence (National Intelligence Model)
Opportunity to plan/prioritise
Conflicting demands, different organisations want different things
Budget reductions - shared money/resources
Collaboration
Multi agency training
P5 Legislation
Anti Social Behaviour Crime and Policing Act 2014
Terrorism, Sexual Harm, Community Protection Notice, Dog Ownership, Community Remedy
Crime and Disorder Act 1998
Section 17 required local authorities to hold MARAC meetings, made a legal responsibility for services to cooperate - ASBOs, sexual offender register etc.
Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011
Enforced PCCs outside of London
Anti social behaviour 2003
Police Reform Act 2002
P8 Local
Bobby van
Wiltshire knife crime (Operation Sceptre)
Neighbourhood Wardens
Drug Intervention
Antisocial behaviour strategy
M4 Analyse how one local and one national strategy work to reduce crime and disorder
PREVENT
County Lines
National Intelligence Model
P8 National
Immobilise
Smart Water
Bullock and Tilley
P6 Roles and Responsibilities
Police, Local Authority, Education, Probation, Health Services,
Working together on a strategy to reduce crime - explain how probation, police and local authority work together to reduce crime, MARAC meetings and stuff